Catalogus
| Uitgever | Thorn, Abbey of |
|---|---|
| Jaar | 1000-1100 |
| Type | Standard circulation coin |
| Waarde | 1 Denier (1/8) |
| Valuta | Groot (-1506) |
| Samenstelling | Silver |
| Gewicht | |
| Diameter | |
| Dikte | |
| Vorm | Round (irregular) |
| Techniek | Hammered |
| Oriëntatie | Variable alignment ↺ |
| Graveur(s) | |
| In omloop tot | |
| Referentie(s) | Kluge Kar#401 |
| Beschrijving voorzijde | Two-line inscription wihin temple, legend around. |
|---|---|
| Schrift voorzijde | Latin |
| Opschrift voorzijde | AGR ANI SCA COLONI |
| Beschrijving keerzijde | Short cross pattée with ball at tip of each arm. Retrograde legend around. |
| Schrift keerzijde | Latin (retrograde) |
| Opschrift keerzijde |
✠ TORENSVMPC (Translation: Thorn abbey) |
| Rand | |
| Muntplaats | |
| Oplage |
ND (1000-1100) - - |
| Numisquare-ID | 1080555970 |
| Aanvullende informatie |
Historical Context: This anonymous denier originates from the Abbey of Thorn during the High Middle Ages, specifically the 11th century (1000-1100). As an Imperial Abbey within the Holy Roman Empire, Thorn held significant temporal power, including the regalian right to mint coinage. Issued under the Abbess's authority, these coins served as vital currency for local commerce, asserting the Abbey's economic autonomy and prestigious imperial immediacy amidst feudal decentralization and the Investiture Controversy.
Artistry: The engraver of this denier remains anonymous, typical for the period. Stylistically, it reflects the early Romanesque aesthetic prevalent in 11th-century northern European coinage. Designs commonly feature highly stylized religious or institutional symbols, such as a central cross on one side and a simplified bust, monogram, or architectural element on the reverse. Artistry prioritizes symbolic representation over realistic portraiture, characteristic of medieval numismatic design.
Technical/Grading: Common for medieval hammer-struck coinage, this denier likely exhibits an irregular flan and potential off-center strike. High-points for wear typically include central design elements, such as the cross arms or raised features of a bust or monogram. Strike quality varies significantly, often showing weakness from uneven force distribution during striking. Metal purity could also contribute to varying strike definition and overall preservation.