目录
| 发行方 | Moscow, Grand principality of |
|---|---|
| 年份 | 1380-1389 |
| 类型 | Standard circulation coin |
| 面值 | 1 Denga (0.005) |
| 货币 | Rouble (1381-1534) |
| 材质 | Silver |
| 重量 | 1 g |
| 直径 | 14 mm |
| 厚度 | |
| 形状 | Round (irregular) |
| 制作工艺 | Countermarked |
| 方向 | Variable alignment ↺ |
| 雕刻师 | |
| 流通至 | |
| 参考资料 | HPF#111 |
| 正面描述 | Countermarked in the form of a distorted Arabic inscription |
|---|---|
| 正面文字 | |
| 正面铭文 |
مَالِك (Malek) (Translation: King or ruler) |
| 背面描述 | Blank or an imitation of a Jochid dang |
| 背面文字 | |
| 背面铭文 | |
| 边缘 | |
| 铸币厂 | |
| 铸造量 |
ND (1380-1389) - Large countermark. Blank reverse (111A) - ND (1380-1389) - Large countermark. Imitation of Jochid dang on reverse (111B) - ND (1380-1389) - Small countermark. Imitation of Jochid dang on reverse (111C) - |
| Numisquare 编号 | 1026965090 |
| 附加信息 |
Historical Context: This Denga, issued by Grand Prince Dmitry Donskoy (r. 1359-1389) during 1380-1389, signifies a pivotal era for Moscow. Post-Kulikovo (1380), Dmitry's reign cemented Muscovite power, initiating the path to independence from the Golden Horde. The "Kolomna countermarked" designation suggests revalidation for circulation in Kolomna, a strategic hub. Such countermarks often reflect evolving monetary policy or assertions of territorial authority.
Artistry: The original Denga design, typical of early Muscovite coinage, featured a stylized rider with rudimentary Cyrillic legends. Engravers are anonymous; the stylistic school shows nascent Russian iconography, evolving from Golden Horde prototypes. The countermark is a key artistic element, often a simple geometric shape or symbol, applied with a punch. Its execution, though rudimentary, served a vital administrative purpose, enriching the coin's historical and visual narrative.
Technical/Grading: Struck on a small, thin silver flan (1 gram, 14 millimeters), this Denga often exhibits irregular planchets and variable strike quality. High-points for wear or clarity include the rider's head, horse's features, and prominent legend elements. For this specimen, the clarity and depth of the Kolomna countermark are paramount. A well-impressed countermark, even if slightly off-flan, is highly valued. Assess legibility of both the original design and the superimposed mark.