Denga - Dmitry Donskoy Kolomna countermarked

Emitent Moscow, Grand principality of
Rok 1380-1389
Typ Standard circulation coin
Nominał 1 Denga (0.005)
Waluta Rouble (1381-1534)
Skład Silver
Waga 1 g
Średnica 14 mm
Grubość
Kształt Round (irregular)
Technika Countermarked
Orientacja Variable alignment ↺
Rytownik(zy)
W obiegu do
Źródło(a) HPF#111
Opis awersu Countermarked in the form of a distorted Arabic inscription
Pismo awersu
Legenda awersu مَالِك (Malek)
(Translation: King or ruler)
Opis rewersu Blank or an imitation of a Jochid dang
Pismo rewersu
Legenda rewersu
Krawędź
Mennica
Nakład ND (1380-1389) - Large countermark. Blank reverse (111A) -
ND (1380-1389) - Large countermark. Imitation of Jochid dang on reverse (111B) -
ND (1380-1389) - Small countermark. Imitation of Jochid dang on reverse (111C) -
ID Numisquare 1026965090
Dodatkowe informacje

Historical Context: This Denga, issued by Grand Prince Dmitry Donskoy (r. 1359-1389) during 1380-1389, signifies a pivotal era for Moscow. Post-Kulikovo (1380), Dmitry's reign cemented Muscovite power, initiating the path to independence from the Golden Horde. The "Kolomna countermarked" designation suggests revalidation for circulation in Kolomna, a strategic hub. Such countermarks often reflect evolving monetary policy or assertions of territorial authority.

Artistry: The original Denga design, typical of early Muscovite coinage, featured a stylized rider with rudimentary Cyrillic legends. Engravers are anonymous; the stylistic school shows nascent Russian iconography, evolving from Golden Horde prototypes. The countermark is a key artistic element, often a simple geometric shape or symbol, applied with a punch. Its execution, though rudimentary, served a vital administrative purpose, enriching the coin's historical and visual narrative.

Technical/Grading: Struck on a small, thin silver flan (1 gram, 14 millimeters), this Denga often exhibits irregular planchets and variable strike quality. High-points for wear or clarity include the rider's head, horse's features, and prominent legend elements. For this specimen, the clarity and depth of the Kolomna countermark are paramount. A well-impressed countermark, even if slightly off-flan, is highly valued. Assess legibility of both the original design and the superimposed mark.

×