Katalog
Warum registrieren? Nur um Bots aus unserem Katalog fernzuhalten. Ihre E-Mail bleibt privat — wir geben sie nie weiter und senden Ihnen nichts Unerwünschtes. Das garantieren wir Ihnen!
| Emittent | Rostov, Principality of |
|---|---|
| Jahr | 1404-1409 |
| Typ | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Nennwert | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Währung | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Material | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Gewicht | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Durchmesser | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Dicke | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Form | Irregular |
| Prägetechnik | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Ausrichtung | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Stempelschneider | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Im Umlauf bis | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Referenz(en) | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Aversbeschreibung | Crudely struck hammered silver flan of irregular, tear-drop form typical of early Russian wire-money coinage. The obverse bears a poorly preserved design in the field, with faint traces of a stylized figure or heraldic motif characteristic of Rostov princely coinage of the early 15th century. The striking is off-center, with portions of the design extending toward the flan edges. Surface wear and die deterioration obscure fine detail, consistent with the primitive minting technology of the appanage period. |
|---|---|
| Aversschrift | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Averslegende | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Reversbeschreibung | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Reversschrift | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Reverslegende | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Rand | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Prägestätte | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Auflage | ND (1404-1409) |
| Zusätzliche Informationen |
The Rostov principality by the early fifteenth century was already deeply subordinate to Moscow, and coins struck under its princes functioned less as instruments of independent monetary policy than as markers of residual dynastic identity. Andrei Fedorovich had formally acknowledged Muscovite suzerainty, yet local minting continued — a pattern common across the fragmented northeastern Russian principalities in the decades before absorption became total.
Attribution between Andrei Fedorovich and Andrei Alexandrovich remains contested among Russian medieval numismatists, as die evidence alone cannot always resolve which prince authorized a given emission within this narrow five-year window.