Volledige afbeeldingen bekijken — gratis registratie
Doorgaan met Google — het is gratis of registreer met e-mail

Waarom registreren? Alleen om bots buiten ons catalogus te houden. Uw e-mail blijft privé — we delen het nooit en sturen u niets zonder uw toestemming. Dat garanderen wij u!

Denarius Circle and X, Circle and X

Uitgever Taman, Goths from
Jaar 300-350
Type Log in om details te zien
Waarde 1 Denier
Valuta Log in om details te zien
Samenstelling Log in om details te zien
Gewicht Log in om details te zien
Diameter Log in om details te zien
Dikte Log in om details te zien
Vorm Log in om details te zien
Techniek Log in om details te zien
Oriëntatie Log in om details te zien
Graveur(s) Log in om details te zien
In omloop tot Log in om details te zien
Referentie(s) Log in om details te zien
Beschrijving voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Schrift voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Opschrift voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Beschrijving keerzijde A warrior figure stands to the left, holding a spear in the right field. Flanking the warrior's head are two crescents, one on each side, rendered in the barbaric imitative style characteristic of Gothic workshop production. An 'O' and 'X' symbol (circle-and-cross or circle-and-X motif) appears in the lower left field, with a dot, and a corresponding 'OX' device occupies the lower right field. Crescent ornaments are distributed around the periphery of the coin, framing the central design.
Schrift keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Opschrift keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Rand Log in om details te zien
Muntplaats Log in om details te zien
Oplage ND (300-350)
Aanvullende informatie

The Gothic settlements in the Taman Peninsula — the Cimmerian Bosporus region between the Black Sea and the Sea of Azov — produced a sparse and poorly understood coinage during the fourth century, likely tied to Gothic groups who had absorbed Bosporan monetary practices after the kingdom's effective collapse. These pieces circulated in a zone where Roman, Bosporan, and steppe economies intersected uneasily.

The Kleshchinov corpus remains the primary reference for this material, and attribution is still contested among specialists working on late Bosporan and barbarian issues.

MISSCHIEN OOK INTERESSANT