Katalog
Warum registrieren? Nur um Bots aus unserem Katalog fernzuhalten. Ihre E-Mail bleibt privat — wir geben sie nie weiter und senden Ihnen nichts Unerwünschtes. Das garantieren wir Ihnen!
| Emittent | Bankcoop S.A. |
|---|---|
| Jahr | 1993 |
| Typ | Exchange certificate |
| Nennwert | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Währung | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Material | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Größe | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Form | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Druckerei | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Designer | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Stecher | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Im Umlauf bis | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Referenz(en) | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Vorderseitenbeschreibung | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
|---|---|
| Vorderseitenlegende | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Rückseitenbeschreibung | Turquoise reverse of the bifold certificate, divided into four numbered sections on the right panel for completion by the holder and bank staff, covering deposit receipt, identity document, payment settlement, and prize draw winnings. The left panel contains fields for the account holder's personal data, authorised persons, issuing branch details, emission date, and bank officer signature, with the Bankcoop S.A. emblem at upper left and a large diagonal watermark-style overprint reading 10.000 lei across the centre. |
| Rückseitenlegende | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Unterschrift(en) | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Sicherheitsmerkmal | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Beschreibung der Sicherheitsmerkmale | Diagonal overprint reading 10.000 lei across the reverse face |
| Varianten | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Anmerkungen |
Bankcoop S.A. was a Romanian cooperative bank that collapsed spectacularly in 1999 — one of the more damaging bank failures of Romania's post-communist financial liberalization, affecting hundreds of thousands of depositors. This certificate predates that collapse by six years, issued during a period when Romania's banking sector was expanding rapidly and with almost no effective regulatory framework. The cooperative banking model was being aggressively marketed to ordinary savers as an alternative to the state banks, and prize-linked deposit certificates like this one were a deliberate draw.
The in-house production credit is unusual. Printing a financial instrument internally rather than through the National Bank's facilities or a licensed security printer was legally permissible for commercial instruments at the time, but it left quality control entirely to the issuer.