Catalog
Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!
| Issuer | Uncertain Gallia Belgica tribes |
|---|---|
| Year | 60 BC - 25 AD |
| Type | Log in to see details |
| Value | Log in to see details |
| Currency | Log in to see details |
| Composition | Bronze |
| Weight | Log in to see details |
| Diameter | Log in to see details |
| Thickness | Log in to see details |
| Shape | Log in to see details |
| Technique | Log in to see details |
| Orientation | Log in to see details |
| Engraver(s) | Log in to see details |
| In circulation to | Log in to see details |
| Reference(s) | Log in to see details |
| Obverse description | Log in to see details |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | Log in to see details |
| Obverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Reverse description | A free horse depicted in vigorous gallop to the right, rendered in the highly stylized, abstracted manner characteristic of Gallo-Belgic Celtic coinage. Two multi-pointed star symbols are positioned above and below the horse, framing the central equine motif within the field. The horse's body is schematically treated with curvilinear lines suggesting musculature and movement, while the legs are elongated and simplified. The die style and iconographic program are consistent with the anonymous bronze coinage attributed to the tribes of Gallia Belgica. The flan shows typical irregular casting edges and surface patination consistent with extended burial. |
| Reverse script | Log in to see details |
| Reverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Edge | Log in to see details |
| Mint | Log in to see details |
| Mintage | ND (60 BC - 25 AD) |
| Additional information |
DT 296 falls within a cluster of small bronzes attributed to the tribes of Gallia Belgica, a region that Caesar was actively subduing between 57 and 51 BC — meaning many coins of this type were struck by peoples either at war with Rome or freshly conquered. Attribution remains uncertain because the iconographic vocabulary of Belgic bronze coinage was widely shared across tribal boundaries, making die-link studies the only reliable method of narrowing provenance.