Catalogus
Waarom registreren? Alleen om bots buiten ons catalogus te houden. Uw e-mail blijft privé — we delen het nooit en sturen u niets zonder uw toestemming. Dat garanderen wij u!
| Uitgever | Roman Empire (27 BC - 395 AD) |
|---|---|
| Jaar | 305-307 |
| Type | Log in om details te zien |
| Waarde | Log in om details te zien |
| Valuta | Argenteus, Reform of Diocletian (AD 293/301 – 310/324) |
| Samenstelling | Log in om details te zien |
| Gewicht | Log in om details te zien |
| Diameter | Log in om details te zien |
| Dikte | Log in om details te zien |
| Vorm | Log in om details te zien |
| Techniek | Log in om details te zien |
| Oriëntatie | Log in om details te zien |
| Graveur(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| In omloop tot | Log in om details te zien |
| Referentie(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| Beschrijving voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
|---|---|
| Schrift voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Opschrift voorzijde | MAXIMINVS NOB C |
| Beschrijving keerzijde | Hercules stands facing, head turned slightly to his right, rendered in heroic nudity with impressive musculature typical of Tetrarchic reverse imagery. He rests his right hand upon his club, which is planted on the ground beside him, while in his left hand he holds the Nemean lion's skin and the three golden apples of the Hesperides. A bow and quiver are visible in the right field. The legend HERCVLI CONSER AVGG ET CAESS NN — invoking Hercules as Protector of the Augusti and Caesars — encircles the figure, and the Trier mint mark TR appears in the exergue. |
| Schrift keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Opschrift keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Rand | Log in om details te zien |
| Muntplaats | Log in om details te zien |
| Oplage | Log in om details te zien |
| Aanvullende informatie |
Maximinus Daia was appointed Caesar under the Tetrarchic system in 305 AD when Diocletian and Maximian abdicated, though he deeply resented being passed over for the rank of Augustus in favor of Severus and Galerius. The Herculian divine association invoked on this issue was politically loaded — Maximinus aligned himself with the Herculian dynasty of Maximian rather than the Jovian line of Diocletian, a distinction that carried real factional weight during the fragmenting years of the Tetrarchy. Trier, as the western imperial mint, was producing coinage for rulers who would never set foot there.