See full images - free registration
Continue with Google - no registration! or register with email

Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!

As - Augustus IMP T VESP AVG RESTITV S C

Issuer Roman Empire (27 BC - 395 AD)
Year 80-81
Type Log in to see details
Value Log in to see details
Currency Log in to see details
Composition Bronze
Weight Log in to see details
Diameter Log in to see details
Thickness Log in to see details
Shape Log in to see details
Technique Log in to see details
Orientation Log in to see details
Engraver(s) Log in to see details
In circulation to Log in to see details
Reference(s) Log in to see details
Obverse description Bare radiate head of Divus Augustus facing left, rendered in the idealized portrait style characteristic of Julio-Claudian and Flavian commemorative coinage. The radiate crown, symbolizing the deified status of the emperor, is rendered with short pointed rays emanating from the fillet. The portrait is executed in moderate relief with the legend distributed around the periphery of the flan. A dotted border frames the design.
Obverse script Log in to see details
Obverse lettering Log in to see details
Reverse description Log in to see details
Reverse script Log in to see details
Reverse lettering Log in to see details
Edge Log in to see details
Mint Log in to see details
Mintage ND (80-81)
Additional information

This as belongs to a posthumous restoration series issued by Titus in 80–81 AD, honouring his deified father Vespasian. The RESTITVIT legend identifies it as part of a deliberate program in which Titus restruck — or issued in the style of — earlier Julio-Claudian and Flavian types, a gesture of dynastic legitimacy at a politically charged moment: Titus had only just survived the eruption of Vesuvius and a devastating fire in Rome within his first two years of sole rule.

RIC II.1 465 places this piece firmly within that restoration coinage. The series is not rare in isolation, but attributing individual examples to original versus restored strikes requires close attention to style and fabric.

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE