Catalogus
Waarom registreren? Alleen om bots buiten ons catalogus te houden. Uw e-mail blijft privé — we delen het nooit en sturen u niets zonder uw toestemming. Dat garanderen wij u!
| Uitgever | Heraclea Pontica (Bithynia and Pontus) |
|---|---|
| Jaar | 253-268 |
| Type | Log in om details te zien |
| Waarde | Log in om details te zien |
| Valuta | Log in om details te zien |
| Samenstelling | Bronze |
| Gewicht | Log in om details te zien |
| Diameter | Log in om details te zien |
| Dikte | Log in om details te zien |
| Vorm | Log in om details te zien |
| Techniek | Log in om details te zien |
| Oriëntatie | Log in om details te zien |
| Graveur(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| In omloop tot | Log in om details te zien |
| Referentie(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| Beschrijving voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
|---|---|
| Schrift voorzijde | Greek |
| Opschrift voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Beschrijving keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Schrift keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Opschrift keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Rand | Log in om details te zien |
| Muntplaats | Log in om details te zien |
| Oplage | ND (253-268) |
| Aanvullende informatie |
Heraclea Pontica's neokoros status — the right to maintain an imperial cult temple — was a fiercely contested civic honor during the 3rd century, and this joint reign issue advertising that status belongs to a period when such titles were actively used as political currency between cities and emperors. Valerian needed loyalty; Heraclea needed prestige. The arrangement was mutually convenient.
The city had held neokoros rank since at least the Severan period, but reaffirming it on coinage under Valerian and Gallienus reflects the administrative turbulence of the 250s, when the Roman east was absorbing repeated Gothic incursions across the Black Sea littoral — waters Heraclea Pontica sat directly upon.