Catalog
Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!
| Issuer | Heraclea Pontica (Bithynia and Pontus) |
|---|---|
| Year | 253-268 |
| Type | Log in to see details |
| Value | Log in to see details |
| Currency | Log in to see details |
| Composition | Bronze |
| Weight | Log in to see details |
| Diameter | Log in to see details |
| Thickness | Log in to see details |
| Shape | Log in to see details |
| Technique | Log in to see details |
| Orientation | Log in to see details |
| Engraver(s) | Log in to see details |
| In circulation to | Log in to see details |
| Reference(s) | Log in to see details |
| Obverse description | Log in to see details |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | Greek |
| Obverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Reverse description | Log in to see details |
| Reverse script | Log in to see details |
| Reverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Edge | Log in to see details |
| Mint | Log in to see details |
| Mintage | ND (253-268) |
| Additional information |
Heraclea Pontica's neokoros status — the right to maintain an imperial cult temple — was a fiercely contested civic honor during the 3rd century, and this joint reign issue advertising that status belongs to a period when such titles were actively used as political currency between cities and emperors. Valerian needed loyalty; Heraclea needed prestige. The arrangement was mutually convenient.
The city had held neokoros rank since at least the Severan period, but reaffirming it on coinage under Valerian and Gallienus reflects the administrative turbulence of the 250s, when the Roman east was absorbing repeated Gothic incursions across the Black Sea littoral — waters Heraclea Pontica sat directly upon.