Volledige afbeeldingen bekijken — gratis registratie
Doorgaan met Google — het is gratis of registreer met e-mail

Waarom registreren? Alleen om bots buiten ons catalogus te houden. Uw e-mail blijft privé — we delen het nooit en sturen u niets zonder uw toestemming. Dat garanderen wij u!

Æ - Prusias I or II

Uitgever Kings of Bithynia
Jaar 230 BC - 149 BC
Type Standard circulation coin
Waarde Log in om details te zien
Valuta Log in om details te zien
Samenstelling Log in om details te zien
Gewicht Log in om details te zien
Diameter Log in om details te zien
Dikte Log in om details te zien
Vorm Log in om details te zien
Techniek Log in om details te zien
Oriëntatie Log in om details te zien
Graveur(s) Log in om details te zien
In omloop tot Log in om details te zien
Referentie(s) Log in om details te zien
Beschrijving voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Schrift voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Opschrift voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Beschrijving keerzijde A bow and a quiver with arrows, depicted upright and centrally placed in the field — emblems of Apollo as divine patron of the Bithynian royal house. The quiver is shown in detail with its suspension strap, and the strung bow is placed beside it. The Greek royal legend ΒΑΣΙΛΕΩΣ to the right and ΠΡΟΥΣΙΟΥ to the left encircles the central device, reading in full 'of King Prusias.' The composition is bold and well-centered, typical of bronze civic and royal issues of the Hellenistic period.
Schrift keerzijde Greek
Opschrift keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Rand Log in om details te zien
Muntplaats Log in om details te zien
Oplage Log in om details te zien
Aanvullende informatie

Bithynia's two Prusiases ruled across nearly a century of dynastic survival — a kingdom that outlasted Macedonian fragmentation by playing Rome against the Seleucids with calculated deference. Prusias I famously harbored Hannibal after Zama, sheltering the Carthaginian general until Roman diplomatic pressure forced the situation. Hannibal died at Libyssa on Bithynian soil, reportedly around 183 BC, by his own hand rather than face extradition.

Without die study linking this piece to a specific reign, attribution remains genuinely contested between the two kings — the Recueil and Aulock references reflect that unresolved split.

MISSCHIEN OOK INTERESSANT