See full images - free registration
Continue with Google - no registration! or register with email

Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!

Æ - Prusias I or II

Issuer Kings of Bithynia
Year 230 BC - 149 BC
Type Standard circulation coin
Value Log in to see details
Currency Log in to see details
Composition Log in to see details
Weight Log in to see details
Diameter Log in to see details
Thickness Log in to see details
Shape Log in to see details
Technique Log in to see details
Orientation Log in to see details
Engraver(s) Log in to see details
In circulation to Log in to see details
Reference(s) Log in to see details
Obverse description Log in to see details
Obverse script Log in to see details
Obverse lettering Log in to see details
Reverse description A bow and a quiver with arrows, depicted upright and centrally placed in the field — emblems of Apollo as divine patron of the Bithynian royal house. The quiver is shown in detail with its suspension strap, and the strung bow is placed beside it. The Greek royal legend ΒΑΣΙΛΕΩΣ to the right and ΠΡΟΥΣΙΟΥ to the left encircles the central device, reading in full 'of King Prusias.' The composition is bold and well-centered, typical of bronze civic and royal issues of the Hellenistic period.
Reverse script Greek
Reverse lettering Log in to see details
Edge Log in to see details
Mint Log in to see details
Mintage Log in to see details
Additional information

Bithynia's two Prusiases ruled across nearly a century of dynastic survival — a kingdom that outlasted Macedonian fragmentation by playing Rome against the Seleucids with calculated deference. Prusias I famously harbored Hannibal after Zama, sheltering the Carthaginian general until Roman diplomatic pressure forced the situation. Hannibal died at Libyssa on Bithynian soil, reportedly around 183 BC, by his own hand rather than face extradition.

Without die study linking this piece to a specific reign, attribution remains genuinely contested between the two kings — the Recueil and Aulock references reflect that unresolved split.

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE