Catalogus
Volledige afbeeldingen bekijken — gratis registratie
Doorgaan met Google — het is gratis
of registreer met e-mail
Waarom registreren? Alleen om bots buiten ons catalogus te houden. Uw e-mail blijft privé — we delen het nooit en sturen u niets zonder uw toestemming. Dat garanderen wij u!
Æ Paisa
| Uitgever | Princely state of Dewas (Indian princely states) |
|---|---|
| Jaar | 1728-1947 |
| Type | Log in om details te zien |
| Waarde | Log in om details te zien |
| Valuta | Log in om details te zien |
| Samenstelling | Log in om details te zien |
| Gewicht | 13.07 g |
| Diameter | Log in om details te zien |
| Dikte | Log in om details te zien |
| Vorm | Log in om details te zien |
| Techniek | Log in om details te zien |
| Oriëntatie | Log in om details te zien |
| Graveur(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| In omloop tot | Log in om details te zien |
| Referentie(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| Beschrijving voorzijde | Incuse battle axe (parashu) countermark applied to the obverse field of a crudely struck, irregular copper flan. The countermark is deeply impressed and rectangular in outline, with the stylized axe motif centrally placed within the punch. The surrounding flan surface displays characteristic hammered texture with uneven edges and heavy patination consistent with prolonged circulation. |
|---|---|
| Schrift voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Opschrift voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Beschrijving keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Schrift keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Opschrift keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Rand | Plain |
| Muntplaats | Log in om details te zien |
| Oplage | Log in om details te zien |
| Aanvullende informatie |
Dewas was unusual even by the fractured standards of central Indian princely administration — the state was formally divided in 1726 between two branches of the Puar dynasty, Senior and Junior, each issuing their own coinage from what was effectively the same town. Attribution of Dewas copper to one branch or the other remains contested for many pieces, and the Zeno reference alone rarely settles the question.