Volledige afbeeldingen bekijken — gratis registratie
Doorgaan met Google — het is gratis of registreer met e-mail

Waarom registreren? Alleen om bots buiten ons catalogus te houden. Uw e-mail blijft privé — we delen het nooit en sturen u niets zonder uw toestemming. Dat garanderen wij u!

Æ In the name of Constantine I, Bust facing left, with podium

Uitgever Uncertain Germanic tribes
Jaar 325-425
Type Standard circulation coin
Waarde Log in om details te zien
Valuta Log in om details te zien
Samenstelling Log in om details te zien
Gewicht Log in om details te zien
Diameter Log in om details te zien
Dikte Log in om details te zien
Vorm Log in om details te zien
Techniek Log in om details te zien
Oriëntatie Log in om details te zien
Graveur(s) Log in om details te zien
In omloop tot Log in om details te zien
Referentie(s) Log in om details te zien
Beschrijving voorzijde Helmeted and cuirassed bust of Constantine I facing left, rendered in a barbarous imitative style characteristic of Germanic tribal coinage. The effigy is encircled by a degenerate, nonsensical legend derived from an imperial prototype, with individual letterforms distorted beyond legible Latin. The overall execution reflects the hand of a non-Roman die-cutter working from a Siscia mint prototype, resulting in simplified facial features and stylised armour detail.
Schrift voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Opschrift voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Beschrijving keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Schrift keerzijde Latin
Opschrift keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Rand Log in om details te zien
Muntplaats Log in om details te zien
Oplage Log in om details te zien
Aanvullende informatie

These imitative bronzes — struck by Germanic groups operating beyond the Rhine-Danube frontier — were produced in quantity during the fourth and fifth centuries as Roman coinage penetrated barbarian economies through trade, tribute, and military payment. The specific podium bust type is relatively uncommon among the broader mass of Constantinian imitations, suggesting either a more localized copying tradition or a narrower window of production. Attribution remains genuinely difficult; Göbl's typology provides the closest framework but was never intended to be exhaustive for this material.

MISSCHIEN OOK INTERESSANT