See full images - free registration
Continue with Google - no registration! or register with email

Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!

5000 Gulden

Issuer Centrale Bank van Suriname
Year 2000
Type Standard circulation banknote
Value Log in to see details
Currency Log in to see details
Composition Log in to see details
Size Log in to see details
Shape Log in to see details
Printer Log in to see details
Designer(s) Log in to see details
Engraver(s) Log in to see details
In circulation to Log in to see details
Reference(s) Log in to see details
Obverse description Green, yellow, blue, and orange on multicolour underprint. A vignette of the Sun Parakeet (Aratinga solstitialis) occupies the left centre, with the Coat of Arms of Suriname printed at upper centre against an intricate guilloche background. Ascending-size serial numbers appear in black.
Obverse lettering Log in to see details
Reverse description Log in to see details
Reverse lettering DE LA RUE CENTRALE BANK VAN SURINAME 5000 VIJF DUIZEND GULDEN Oncidium papilio NADRUK VERBODEN: SURINAAMS WETBOEK VAN STRAFRECHT ARTIKEL 260
(Translation: De La Rue Central Bank of Suriname Five Thousand Gulden Oncidium papilio Counterfeiting Forbidden: Suriname Criminal Law, Article 260)
Signature(s) Log in to see details
Protection type Log in to see details
Protection description Log in to see details
Variants Log in to see details
Comments

Suriname's 2000 currency reform was driven by a decade of hyperinflation that had reduced the gulden to a fraction of its former value — the 5000 gulden note, once unthinkably large, became an everyday denomination simply to keep pace with prices. The country would abandon the gulden entirely just two years later, replacing it with the Surinamese dollar at a rate of 1000 to 1, which rendered this entire series obsolete almost immediately after printing.

Thomas De La Rue's security package here is relatively modest given the face value — watermark and thread, no optically variable ink — reflecting the practical reality that a currency slated for near-term replacement warranted no substantial investment in advanced counterfeit deterrence.

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE