目录
查看完整图片 — 免费注册
使用Google继续 — 免费
或用邮箱注册
为什么需要注册？只是为了防止机器人访问我们的目录。您的邮箱完全保密——我们绝不会分享或在未经您许可的情况下发送任何内容。我们向您保证！
| 正面描述 | Dark blue intaglio-printed note with a large sculptural vignette at left, after Ivan Meštrović, showing two heroic male figures in relief gazing upward and to the right, executed in fine line engraving. At centre-right, the denomination numeral 5000 is set within an ornate guilloche cartouche, flanked by the multilingual inscriptions ДИНАРА / DINARJEV and DINARA / ДИНАРИ. The bank title НАРОДНА БАНКА ЈУГОСЛАВИЈЕ arcs across the upper register, with the date БЕОГРАД, 1. МАЈ 1963. and two facsimile signatures of the Вицегувернер and Гувернер appearing below the central cartouche; a red serial number in Cyrillic prefix appears at lower centre. |
|---|---|
| 正面铭文 | 登录 以查看详情 |
| 背面描述 | 登录 以查看详情 |
| 背面铭文 | СОЦИЈАЛИСТИЧКА ФЕДЕРАТИВНА РЕПУБЛИКА ЈУГОСЛАВИЈА БОСНА И ХЕРЦЕГОВИНА · МАКЕДОНИЈА · СЛОВЕНИЈА СРБИЈА · ХРВАТСКА · ЦРНА ГОРА ПЕТ ХИЉАДА ДИНАРА ПЕТ ТИСОЦ ДИНАРЈЕВ ПЕТ ХИЉАДА ДИНАРА ПЕТ ИЛЈАДИ ДИНАРИ 5000 SOCIJALISTICKA FEDERATIVNA REPUBLIKA JUGOSLAVIJA ФАЛСИФИКОВАЊЕ СЕ КАЖЊАВА ПО ЗАКОНУ · КРИВОТВОРЕЊЕ СЕ КАЖЊАВА ПО ЗАКОНУ ПОНАРЕЈАЊЕ СЕ КАЗНУЈЕ ПО ЗАКОНУ · ФАЛСИФИКУВАЊЕТО СЕ КАЗНУВА СПОРЕД ЗАКОНОТ M. PETROVIĆ - FEC. T. KRNJAJIĆ - SC. |
| 签名 | 登录 以查看详情 |
| 防伪类型 | 登录 以查看详情 |
| 防伪描述 | 登录 以查看详情 |
| 变体 | 登录 以查看详情 |
| 备注 |
The 5000 Dinara of 1963 belongs to a series issued just two years before Yugoslavia's sweeping 1965 economic reform, which ultimately redenominated the currency at 100 old dinars to 1 new dinar — rendering notes at this face value essentially worthless overnight. High-denomination issues from this period circulated hard in the years preceding the reform, making genuinely uncirculated survivors uncommon.
Krnjajić's engraving work for ZIN during the 1960s is considered among the finer domestic intaglio output of the period. Yugoslavia's decision to keep production entirely in-house at Belgrade rather than contracting to foreign security printers like De La Rue was a deliberate policy position, not a technical one.