See full images - free registration
Continue with Google - no registration! or register with email

Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!

500 000 000 Mark Kreis Jülich

Issuer Kreisausschuß des Kreises Jülich
Year 1923
Type Log in to see details
Value Log in to see details
Currency Log in to see details
Composition Log in to see details
Size Log in to see details
Shape Log in to see details
Printer Log in to see details
Designer(s) Log in to see details
Engraver(s) Log in to see details
In circulation to Log in to see details
Reference(s) Merkelb.2#1819
Obverse description Log in to see details
Obverse lettering 500 000 000 Gutschein des Kreises Jülich 500 000 000 über Mark Fünfhundert Millionen Dieser Gutschein über fünfhundert Millionen Mark ist durch Hinterlegung von Reichsschatzanweisungen gedeckt. Er wird von den kommunalen Kassen und Sparkassen sowie den Banken des Kreises Jülich in Zahlung genommen. Der Schein verliert seine Gültigkeit nach Ablauf von einer Woche nach Aufruf im Jülicher Kreisblatt. Der Kreis Jülich haftet für die Einlösung. Jülich, den 1. Oktober 1923. Der Kreisausschuß des Kreises Jülich NR. ##### Dr. Fischer. Frantzen. Schillings. Buchdruckerei Jos. Fischer, Jülich.
Reverse description Log in to see details
Reverse lettering Log in to see details
Signature(s) Log in to see details
Protection type Watermark
Protection description Log in to see details
Variants Log in to see details
Comments

By late 1923, German hyperinflation had forced regional administrative bodies — Kreise, municipalities, chambers of commerce — to issue their own emergency currency simply to meet payroll. The Kreisausschuß des Kreises Jülich, the administrative committee of Jülich district, was one of hundreds of such bodies doing exactly that. At 500,000,000 Mark, this note represents the upper registers of that collapse: a denomination that would have been unimaginable eighteen months earlier.

Printed locally by Buchdruckerei Jos. Fischer — the same firm named in the signature block as "Dr. Fischer" — which raises the question of whether the printer and one of the authorizing signatories were the same individual or related parties. The watermarked paper was a concession to legitimacy in a note that few users would scrutinize for long.

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE