目录
查看完整图片 — 免费注册
使用Google继续 — 免费
或用邮箱注册
为什么需要注册？只是为了防止机器人访问我们的目录。您的邮箱完全保密——我们绝不会分享或在未经您许可的情况下发送任何内容。我们向您保证！
| 正面描述 | 登录 以查看详情 |
|---|---|
| 正面铭文 | Stadt Soest 50 50 Fünfzig Mark A zahlt die Stadthauptkasse Soest dem Einlieferer dieses Gutscheines. Dieser Gutschein verliert die Gültigkeit zwei Wochen nach öffentlicher Bekanntmachung im Soester Kreisblatt und im Soester Anzeiger. Soest, den 11. November 1922. Der Magistrat |
| 背面描述 | 登录 以查看详情 |
| 背面铭文 | Opera enem illorum secuntur illos. Wei sit an geld und guet vergrippt, Wärt in diän gräuten duik gewippt. Nachbildung aus dem Soester Nequambuch "Die Wippe" RUSIKU - DORTMUND |
| 签名 | 登录 以查看详情 |
| 防伪类型 | 登录 以查看详情 |
| 防伪描述 | 登录 以查看详情 |
| 变体 | 登录 以查看详情 |
| 备注 |
Soest was one of hundreds of German municipalities that turned to Notgeld during the hyperinflationary spiral of the early 1920s, but the city had a particular administrative reason to issue higher-denomination notes by 1922: the Reichsbank's own supply of small and mid-range notes was chronically delayed, and local commerce — especially the weekly markets that Soest had hosted since medieval times — had effectively ground to a halt without workable circulating currency. The 50 Mark denomination sits at an awkward transitional point in that crisis, large enough to suggest genuine purchasing pressure but already being eroded by monthly inflation figures running into double digits.
W. Crüwell was a well-established Dortmund commercial printer, not a security specialist, which is typical for Westphalian municipal issues of this period. Redemption of most Soest Notgeld was formalized by late 1923 when Rentenmark stabilization made local emergency issues legally redundant.