Katalog
Warum registrieren? Nur um Bots aus unserem Katalog fernzuhalten. Ihre E-Mail bleibt privat — wir geben sie nie weiter und senden Ihnen nichts Unerwünschtes. Das garantieren wir Ihnen!
| Emittent | Banco Central de Bolivia |
|---|---|
| Jahr | 1995-2001 |
| Typ | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Nennwert | 50 Bolivianos |
| Währung | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Material | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Größe | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Form | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Druckerei | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Designer | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Stecher | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Im Umlauf bis | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Referenz(en) | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Vorderseitenbeschreibung | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
|---|---|
| Vorderseitenlegende | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Rückseitenbeschreibung | Central vignette presents an intaglio rendering of the Torre de la Compañía in Potosí, its ornate Baroque façade framed by flowing ribbon guilloche elements in violet-purple. The numerals '50' appear in the upper right and lower left corners, with the denomination text set along the lower margin. |
| Rückseitenlegende | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Unterschrift(en) | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Sicherheitsmerkmal | Watermark, Security thread |
| Beschreibung der Sicherheitsmerkmale | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Varianten | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Anmerkungen |
The Banco Central de Bolivia's 50 Bolivianos note belongs to the post-hyperinflation rebuilding of Bolivian currency — the boliviano itself was only reintroduced in 1987, replacing the peso boliviano at a rate of one million to one after inflation had rendered smaller denominations meaningless. By the mid-1990s, when this series entered circulation, the central bank was still working to establish credibility in a denomination structure that a decade earlier had been effectively worthless at equivalent face value.
The "Holguin" designation and the D-E series indicators suggest this ran across two distinct print orders within the six-year issue window, though the print figures listed — 20,000 each in 1885 and 1886 — appear to be erroneous metadata, almost certainly misattributed from a different catalog entry entirely.