Volledige afbeeldingen bekijken — gratis registratie
Doorgaan met Google — het is gratis of registreer met e-mail

Waarom registreren? Alleen om bots buiten ons catalogus te houden. Uw e-mail blijft privé — we delen het nooit en sturen u niets zonder uw toestemming. Dat garanderen wij u!

5 Kreuzers - Charles Thomas

Uitgever Löwenstein-Wertheim-Rochefort
Jaar 1767-1769
Type Log in om details te zien
Waarde Log in om details te zien
Valuta Log in om details te zien
Samenstelling Silver
Gewicht Log in om details te zien
Diameter Log in om details te zien
Dikte Log in om details te zien
Vorm Log in om details te zien
Techniek Log in om details te zien
Oriëntatie Log in om details te zien
Graveur(s) Log in om details te zien
In omloop tot Log in om details te zien
Referentie(s) Log in om details te zien
Beschrijving voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Schrift voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Opschrift voorzijde CAROL . D . G . S . R . I . PR . DE. LOEWENST . WERTH . & .
Beschrijving keerzijde A princely coronet surmounts a heraldic composition of three conjoined shields of arms arranged in a trefoil formation, representing the territories of Löwenstein, Wertheim, and Rochefort. The numeral 5, denoting the face value in Kreuzer, appears in a recessed frame at the base of the shield grouping. The partial date is split across the lower field, flanked by the mintmaster's initials W.E., with the fineness standard inscription 240 EINE FEINE MARCK running along the upper legend and IUSTIRT indicating the coin's assay certification.
Schrift keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Opschrift keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Rand Log in om details te zien
Muntplaats Log in om details te zien
Oplage Log in om details te zien
Aanvullende informatie

Löwenstein-Wertheim-Rochefort was one of the more obscure subdivisions of the Holy Roman Empire — a Franconian county whose coinage rights were exercised only sporadically and whose issues consequently appear in small quantities. Charles Thomas ruled from 1735 until his death in 1789, and this brief minting window of 1767–69 likely corresponds to a specific fiscal need rather than any sustained monetary program. The county had no permanent mint of its own and contracted work out, which accounts for the die inconsistencies Wibel documents across the type.

MISSCHIEN OOK INTERESSANT