Catalogus
Volledige afbeeldingen bekijken — gratis registratie
Doorgaan met Google — het is gratis
of registreer met e-mail
Waarom registreren? Alleen om bots buiten ons catalogus te houden. Uw e-mail blijft privé — we delen het nooit en sturen u niets zonder uw toestemming. Dat garanderen wij u!
5 Cents Camp Atterbury PoW Canteen
| Uitgever | Camp Atterbury Internment Camp Canteen |
|---|---|
| Jaar | 1942 |
| Type | Log in om details te zien |
| Waarde | Log in om details te zien |
| Valuta | Dollar (1785-date) |
| Samenstelling | Log in om details te zien |
| Afmetingen | Log in om details te zien |
| Vorm | Log in om details te zien |
| Drukker | Log in om details te zien |
| Ontwerper(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| Graveur(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| In omloop tot | Log in om details te zien |
| Referentie(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| Beschrijving voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
|---|---|
| Opschrift voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Beschrijving keerzijde | Plain yellow paper with no printed design or lettering; scattered punch-hole perforations from the obverse are visible through the stock. |
| Opschrift keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Handtekening(en) | Log in om details te zien |
| Beveiligingstype | Log in om details te zien |
| Beschrijving beveiliging | Multiple small circular punch-hole perforations distributed across the voucher face, serving as a security and cancellation measure. |
| Varianten | Log in om details te zien |
| Opmerkingen |
Camp Atterbury, established in 1942 near Edinburgh, Indiana, held both German and Italian prisoners of war under the Geneva Convention's requirement that canteen facilities be provided to internees. U.S. Army PoW camp canteen money was deliberately made non-transferable — the perforation served as a simple but effective mechanism to distinguish camp scrip from ordinary currency, reducing the risk of notes escaping the canteen economy into surrounding communities.
The Geneva Convention obligation also meant the U.S. government had to maintain at least nominal accounting of canteen profits, which were theoretically credited back to prisoners. Whether that accounting was scrupulous at Atterbury is a separate question.