Volledige afbeeldingen bekijken — gratis registratie
Doorgaan met Google — het is gratis of registreer met e-mail

Waarom registreren? Alleen om bots buiten ons catalogus te houden. Uw e-mail blijft privé — we delen het nooit en sturen u niets zonder uw toestemming. Dat garanderen wij u!

4 Tangas - Filipe III Goa mint, countermarked

Uitgever Portuguese Estado da India
Jaar 1621-1640
Type Log in om details te zien
Waarde Log in om details te zien
Valuta Xerafim (1580-1706)
Samenstelling Log in om details te zien
Gewicht Log in om details te zien
Diameter Log in om details te zien
Dikte Log in om details te zien
Vorm Log in om details te zien
Techniek Log in om details te zien
Oriëntatie Log in om details te zien
Graveur(s) Log in om details te zien
In omloop tot Log in om details te zien
Referentie(s) Log in om details te zien
Beschrijving voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Schrift voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Opschrift voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Beschrijving keerzijde The reverse bears a prominent countermark consisting of a conjoined 'AT' monogram — standing for 'Asia Tanga' — with the letters 'D' and 'M' placed below, flanking the base of the monogram and signifying 'de Malaca' (of Malacca). The monogram is boldly engraved in a punched countermark style applied to the host coin, occupying the central field. The surrounding surface retains traces of the underlying Goa-mint host coin design. A beaded border frames the periphery of the flan.
Schrift keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Opschrift keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Rand Log in om details te zien
Muntplaats Goa Mint
Oplage Log in om details te zien
Aanvullende informatie

Portugal's Goa mint operated under chronic silver shortages throughout the early seventeenth century, and the countermark program applied to these 4 Tanga pieces was a direct administrative response — existing coin was restruck with official validation rather than recalled and remelted. Filipe III, ruling Portugal as the third of that name following the Iberian Union, never visited India; monetary policy for Estado da India was managed at considerable remove from Lisbon.

The countermark itself is the authenticating detail that matters here. Without it, the host coin would have circulated at a discount or been refused entirely at colonial markets.

MISSCHIEN OOK INTERESSANT