کاتالوگ
| صادرکننده | Kallatis |
|---|---|
| سال | 300 BC - 201 BC |
| نوع | Standard circulation coin |
| ارزش | |
| واحد پول | Drachm |
| ترکیب | Bronze |
| وزن | 5.91 g |
| قطر | 23 mm |
| ضخامت | |
| شکل | Round (irregular) |
| تکنیک | Hammered, Countermarked |
| جهت | Variable alignment ↺ |
| حکاک(ها) | |
| در گردش تا | |
| مرجع(ها) | HGC 3.2#1829 |
| توضیحات روی سکه | Ivy-wreathed head of Dionysos right. Countermark: head of Artemis right, bow and quiver. |
|---|---|
| خط روی سکه | |
| نوشتههای روی سکه | |
| توضیحات پشت سکه | >E monogram within Ivy wreath; legend above. |
| خط پشت سکه | Greek |
| نوشتههای پشت سکه | ΚΑΛΛΑ |
| لبه | |
| ضرابخانه | |
| تیراژ ضرب |
ND (300 BC - 201 BC) - - |
| شناسه Numisquare | 9819700600 |
| اطلاعات تکمیلی |
Historical Context: This Æ23 bronze coin from Kallatis dates to the Hellenistic period (300-201 BC), an era of profound political change for Greek cities. Kallatis, a key Black Sea colony, navigated shifting alliances with Macedonian Successors and Thracian powers. Bronze coinage served essential local commerce. The countermark is significant, often indicating revalidation, a change in monetary authority, or extending the coin's usable life, reflecting periods of economic necessity or political transition.
Artistry: The anonymous engraver, typical for civic bronzes, followed the Hellenistic stylistic school, blending naturalism with idealized forms. The original design, common for Kallatis, likely depicted a patron deity or civic emblem. The countermark, applied post-strike, represents a secondary artistic intervention. Its clarity and specific design (unspecified here) overlay the original iconography, adding a historical narrative layer and sometimes obscuring the underlying artistry.
Technical/Grading: Struck on a bronze flan (5.91g, 23mm), this coin shows typical Hellenistic civic issue characteristics. Technical strike quality varies, often with some off-centeredness or weakness. Key high-points for wear are typically prominent facial features or hair. The countermark's application is crucial; its depth, sharpness, and position relative to the original design are vital for assessing its quality. Patination is also critical for the aesthetic preservation and readability of such bronze issues.