Katalog
| Emitent | Kallatis |
|---|---|
| Rok | 300 BC - 201 BC |
| Typ | Standard circulation coin |
| Hodnota | |
| Měna | Drachm |
| Složení | Bronze |
| Hmotnost | 5.91 g |
| Průměr | 23 mm |
| Tloušťka | |
| Tvar | Round (irregular) |
| Technika | Hammered, Countermarked |
| Orientace | Variable alignment ↺ |
| Rytci | |
| V oběhu do | |
| Reference | HGC 3.2#1829 |
| Popis líce | Ivy-wreathed head of Dionysos right. Countermark: head of Artemis right, bow and quiver. |
|---|---|
| Písmo líce | |
| Opis líce | |
| Popis rubu | >E monogram within Ivy wreath; legend above. |
| Písmo rubu | Greek |
| Opis rubu | ΚΑΛΛΑ |
| Hrana | |
| Mincovna | |
| Náklad |
ND (300 BC - 201 BC) - - |
| ID Numisquare | 9819700600 |
| Další informace |
Historical Context: This Æ23 bronze coin from Kallatis dates to the Hellenistic period (300-201 BC), an era of profound political change for Greek cities. Kallatis, a key Black Sea colony, navigated shifting alliances with Macedonian Successors and Thracian powers. Bronze coinage served essential local commerce. The countermark is significant, often indicating revalidation, a change in monetary authority, or extending the coin's usable life, reflecting periods of economic necessity or political transition.
Artistry: The anonymous engraver, typical for civic bronzes, followed the Hellenistic stylistic school, blending naturalism with idealized forms. The original design, common for Kallatis, likely depicted a patron deity or civic emblem. The countermark, applied post-strike, represents a secondary artistic intervention. Its clarity and specific design (unspecified here) overlay the original iconography, adding a historical narrative layer and sometimes obscuring the underlying artistry.
Technical/Grading: Struck on a bronze flan (5.91g, 23mm), this coin shows typical Hellenistic civic issue characteristics. Technical strike quality varies, often with some off-centeredness or weakness. Key high-points for wear are typically prominent facial features or hair. The countermark's application is crucial; its depth, sharpness, and position relative to the original design are vital for assessing its quality. Patination is also critical for the aesthetic preservation and readability of such bronze issues.