Katalog
| İhraççı | Tomis |
|---|---|
| Yıl | 260 BC - 200 BC |
| Tür | Standard circulation coin |
| Değer | |
| Para birimi | Drachm |
| Bileşim | Bronze |
| Ağırlık | 7.71 g |
| Çap | 22.0 mm |
| Kalınlık | |
| Şekil | Round (irregular) |
| Teknik | Hammered, Countermarked |
| Yönlendirme | |
| Gravürcü(ler) | |
| Dolaşımda olduğu yıl | |
| Referans(lar) | HGC 3.2#1935, AMNG I-I#2416, SNG BM Black Sea#302 |
| Ön yüz açıklaması | Diademed head of Zeus right. Countermark: head of Hermes right, wearing petasos. |
|---|---|
| Ön yüz yazısı | |
| Ön yüz lejandı | |
| Arka yüz açıklaması | Eagle standing right within wreath. ΤΟΜΙ above ΛΕΟΝ below. |
| Arka yüz yazısı | Greek |
| Arka yüz lejandı | ΤΟΜΙ ΛΕΟΝ |
| Kenar | |
| Darphane | |
| Basma adedi |
ND (260 BC - 200 BC) - - |
| Numisquare Kimliği | 4609561940 |
| Ek bilgiler |
Historical Context: This Æ22 bronze coin from Tomis, issued between 260 BC and 200 BC, from a vital Hellenistic Black Sea colony. Tomis, a significant trading hub, navigated complex regional politics post-Alexander. The "Countermarked" aspect is crucial, indicating a revalidation or re-tariffing of circulating currency. This practice allowed the city to extend coinage utility during economic instability or assert authority, often amidst interactions with Scythian or Thracian tribes, reflecting pragmatic policy.
Artistry: The anonymous engraver reflects the provincial Hellenistic style of Black Sea Greek colonies. Original designs typically featured a prominent deity (e.g., Dionysus or Demeter) on the obverse, with classical influences. The reverse often displayed a civic symbol (e.g., eagle or grain ears). The countermark, a distinct secondary impression, is a simplified device—perhaps a monogram or animal—applied later to signify re-authorization, adding a unique layer.
Technical/Grading: Struck on a 7.71-gram, 22.0-millimeter bronze flan, this piece exhibits typical Hellenistic bronze fabrication. High-points (e.g., obverse portrait's hair, central reverse elements) are susceptible to wear. Strike quality often varies, with potential for irregular flans, off-center strikes, or weaker impressions. The forceful application of the countermark frequently distorts or partially obliterates the original design in its immediate area, impacting overall preservation and aesthetic integrity.