Catalogo
| Emittente | Tomis |
|---|---|
| Anno | 260 BC - 200 BC |
| Tipo | Standard circulation coin |
| Valore | |
| Valuta | Drachm |
| Composizione | Bronze |
| Peso | 7.71 g |
| Diametro | 22.0 mm |
| Spessore | |
| Forma | Round (irregular) |
| Tecnica | Hammered, Countermarked |
| Orientamento | |
| Incisore/i | |
| In circolazione fino al | |
| Riferimento/i | HGC 3.2#1935, AMNG I-I#2416, SNG BM Black Sea#302 |
| Descrizione del dritto | Diademed head of Zeus right. Countermark: head of Hermes right, wearing petasos. |
|---|---|
| Scrittura del dritto | |
| Legenda del dritto | |
| Descrizione del rovescio | Eagle standing right within wreath. ΤΟΜΙ above ΛΕΟΝ below. |
| Scrittura del rovescio | Greek |
| Legenda del rovescio | ΤΟΜΙ ΛΕΟΝ |
| Bordo | |
| Zecca | |
| Tiratura |
ND (260 BC - 200 BC) - - |
| ID Numisquare | 4609561940 |
| Informazioni aggiuntive |
Historical Context: This Æ22 bronze coin from Tomis, issued between 260 BC and 200 BC, from a vital Hellenistic Black Sea colony. Tomis, a significant trading hub, navigated complex regional politics post-Alexander. The "Countermarked" aspect is crucial, indicating a revalidation or re-tariffing of circulating currency. This practice allowed the city to extend coinage utility during economic instability or assert authority, often amidst interactions with Scythian or Thracian tribes, reflecting pragmatic policy.
Artistry: The anonymous engraver reflects the provincial Hellenistic style of Black Sea Greek colonies. Original designs typically featured a prominent deity (e.g., Dionysus or Demeter) on the obverse, with classical influences. The reverse often displayed a civic symbol (e.g., eagle or grain ears). The countermark, a distinct secondary impression, is a simplified device—perhaps a monogram or animal—applied later to signify re-authorization, adding a unique layer.
Technical/Grading: Struck on a 7.71-gram, 22.0-millimeter bronze flan, this piece exhibits typical Hellenistic bronze fabrication. High-points (e.g., obverse portrait's hair, central reverse elements) are susceptible to wear. Strike quality often varies, with potential for irregular flans, off-center strikes, or weaker impressions. The forceful application of the countermark frequently distorts or partially obliterates the original design in its immediate area, impacting overall preservation and aesthetic integrity.