Katalog
| Emittent | Frentrum |
|---|---|
| Jahr | 260 BC - 240 BC |
| Typ | Standard circulation coin |
| Nennwert | |
| Währung | |
| Material | Bronze |
| Gewicht | 6.79 g |
| Durchmesser | 20 mm |
| Dicke | |
| Form | Round (irregular) |
| Prägetechnik | Hammered |
| Ausrichtung | |
| Stempelschneider | |
| Im Umlauf bis | |
| Referenz(en) | HN Italy#621, Campana#1, BMC Gr/It#p.69, Laffaille#6, SNG ANS 1#129 |
| Aversbeschreibung | Mercury wearing winged petasos facing left with legend in front. |
|---|---|
| Aversschrift | |
| Averslegende |
BDENTDEY (Translation: Frentrum) |
| Reversbeschreibung | Pegasus above podium running left with legend below. |
| Reversschrift | |
| Reverslegende |
BDENTDEY (Translation: Frentrum) |
| Rand | Smooth. |
| Prägestätte | |
| Auflage |
ND (260 BC - 240 BC) - - |
| Numisquare-ID | 7176009820 |
| Zusätzliche Informationen |
Historical Context: This Æ20, issued by Frentrum (the Frentani tribe) between 260-240 BC, marks a critical era of Roman expansion in central Italy. After the Pyrrhic War, the Frentani retained local autonomy, including the right to strike bronze coinage for internal circulation. This issue highlights the increasing demand for smaller denominations in local economies, complementing larger silver and facilitating daily transactions amidst Roman monetary influence.
Artistry: Although specific iconography for this Æ20 is not provided, Frentani coinage of this period typically merges indigenous Italic traditions with Hellenistic artistic influences. Engravers, generally anonymous, followed stylistic conventions from Magna Graecia and Campania. Designs often depicted local deities, mythological figures, or regional animal types. The artistry focused on clear recognition on small flans, representing community identity and economic utility, characteristic of contemporary Italic bronze issues.
Technical/Grading: Struck on a bronze flan, 6.79 grams and 20 millimeters, this Æ20 displays typical manufacturing qualities for 3rd century BC Italic bronze issues. High-points, most susceptible to wear, usually involve raised features of the central device, like a deity's hair or face, or an animal's musculature. Technical strike quality varies; off-centring, minor flan irregularities, or weaker strikes, especially at the edges, are common due to the period's striking methods.