Katalog
| Popis líce | Minerva wearing Corinthian helmet facing right. |
|---|---|
| Písmo líce | |
| Opis líce | |
| Popis rubu | Thunderbolt with Latin legend above. |
| Písmo rubu | |
| Opis rubu |
LADINEI (Translation: Larinum) |
| Hrana | Smooth. |
| Mincovna | |
| Náklad |
ND (250 BC - 225 BC) - - |
| ID Numisquare | 5530604700 |
| Další informace |
Historical Context: This Æ20 coin, issued by the ancient Samnite city of Larinum between 250 BC and 225 BC, emerges from a pivotal period in Italian history. Situated in Apulia, Larinum, like many Italic communities, navigated the complex geopolitical landscape dominated by the burgeoning Roman Republic. This timeframe falls squarely between the Pyrrhic Wars and the First Punic War, a period of intense Roman consolidation across Magna Graecia and central Italy. Larinum's continued right to mint coinage, even under increasing Roman hegemony, underscores a degree of retained local autonomy. This bronze issue served essential local economic functions, facilitating daily commerce within the city and its immediate environs.
Artistry: The engraver of this Æ20 remains anonymous, a common circumstance for most ancient coinage. Stylistically, the coin exhibits a blend of Hellenistic artistic influences, prevalent across Magna Graecia, combined with indigenous Italic traditions. While specific design details are not provided, coinage from Larinum typically featured a deity's head on the obverse, such as Athena or Apollo, often rendered with idealized classical features and strong profiles. The reverse commonly depicted an animal, like a horse or an eagle, or a local symbol, executed with a keen eye for anatomical detail and symbolic resonance, reflecting both civic pride and broader artistic trends of the era.
Technical/Grading: Struck in bronze, this coin measures 20 mm in diameter and weighs 6.75 grams. Key high-points susceptible to wear, which are crucial for grading, would typically include the hair, helmet crest, and facial features on a deity's head, or the musculature and extremities of an animal motif. Technical strike qualities vary significantly in ancient bronze issues. A well-executed example would display a full, even strike, good centering on a regular flan, and minimal evidence of die wear or flan imperfections such as porosity. Conversely, weak strikes, off-center impressions, and irregular flan shapes are common, impacting overall visual appeal and grade.