Catálogo
| Emisor | Alaisa Archonidea |
|---|---|
| Año | 241 BC |
| Tipo | Standard circulation coin |
| Valor | Chalkon (5⁄48) |
| Moneda | Litra |
| Composición | Bronze |
| Peso | 7.02 g |
| Diámetro | 19 mm |
| Grosor | |
| Forma | Round (irregular) |
| Técnica | Hammered |
| Orientación | Variable alignment ↺ |
| Grabador(es) | |
| En circulación hasta | |
| Referencia(s) | CNS#2, SNG Morcom#543, HGC 2#192, Buceti#16 |
| Descripción del anverso | Laureate head of Zeus to left. |
|---|---|
| Escritura del anverso | |
| Leyenda del anverso | |
| Descripción del reverso | Eagle, with spread wings, standing to left; tripod to left. |
| Escritura del reverso | Greek |
| Leyenda del reverso | ΑΛΑΙΣΑΣ ΑΡΧ |
| Canto | |
| Casa de moneda | |
| Tirada |
ND (-241) - After 241 BC - |
| ID de Numisquare | 6989580340 |
| Información adicional |
Historical Context: Issued in 241 BC by Alaisa Archonidea, this Æ19 bronze coin dates to a pivotal year, marking the First Punic War's conclusion. While Alaisa's specific domain is debated, the Archonidea appellation suggests a prominent civic or dynastic authority, likely a powerful city-state ruler or regional governor asserting autonomy amidst shifting Hellenistic power dynamics. Its bronze composition indicates a primary role in local commerce and daily transactions, reflecting economic consolidation or local resource mobilization under Alaisa's rule.
Artistry: Though the engraver is unrecorded, the coin exemplifies Hellenistic stylistic traditions of the 3rd century BC. The obverse likely features a finely rendered, diademed bust of Alaisa Archonidea, facing right, blending idealized portraiture with individualistic features common to the era. The reverse typically depicts a standing figure of a local patron deity or a civic emblem, such as an eagle or cornucopia, executed with classical grace. The overall design would have projected authority and cultural sophistication.
Technical/Grading: This Æ19 (7.02 gg, 19 mm) often exhibits variable strike quality, typical of contemporary bronze issues. High-points for wear or strike weakness commonly include the hair and diadem on the obverse portrait, and the extremities or drapery folds of any reverse figure. A well-struck example shows full detail on these areas, with a relatively centered strike and minimal planchet flaws. Lesser strikes frequently present off-center motifs or areas of flatness due to uneven die pressure, obscuring finer details.