Catalog
| Issuer | Tisna |
|---|---|
| Year | 400 BC - 300 BC |
| Type | Standard circulation coin |
| Value | |
| Currency | Drachm |
| Composition | Bronze |
| Weight | 3.41 g |
| Diameter | 16.0 mm |
| Thickness | |
| Shape | Round (irregular) |
| Technique | Hammered |
| Orientation | |
| Engraver(s) | |
| In circulation to | |
| Reference(s) | SNG Copenhagen#283, SNG Munich 1#641 |
| Obverse description | Head of river god Tisnaios facing left |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | |
| Obverse lettering | |
| Reverse description | One-handled cup. Inscription on the right and left |
| Reverse script | Greek |
| Reverse lettering | |
| Edge | |
| Mint | |
| Mintage |
ND (400 BC - 300 BC) - - |
| Numisquare ID | 3870569550 |
| Additional information |
Historical Context:This Æ16 coin was issued by the ancient city of Tisna, located in the historical region of Pisidia or Lycia in Asia Minor, during the period of 400-300 BC. This era marked a transition from Persian satrapal control to the rise of Hellenistic kingdoms, with many cities asserting varying degrees of autonomy. Bronze coinage like this Æ16 served as essential small change for local commerce, reflecting Tisna's economic activity and civic identity within a complex geopolitical landscape, often navigating influences from powerful neighbors and empires.
Artistry:The engravers of these local bronze issues remain anonymous, but their work reflects the prevailing artistic currents of the late Classical and early Hellenistic periods in Asia Minor. Typically, such coins feature a deity's head on the obverse, often Apollo or Artemis, rendered with robust yet sometimes simplified features suitable for the small flan. The reverse commonly displays an associated symbol, such as a lyre or bow, executed with a focus on clear, recognizable iconography rather than intricate detail, showcasing local religious veneration and civic pride.
Technical/Grading:Weighing 3.41 grams and measuring 16.0 mm, this Æ16 exhibits typical characteristics of local bronze issues. High-points susceptible to wear usually include the prominent features of the deity's portrait—hair, nose, and chin—along with the central elements of the reverse device. The strike quality can vary; bronze flans were often less carefully prepared and struck than silver, leading to common occurrences of irregular flans, minor off-centering, or areas of weakness, which are crucial considerations for accurate grading.