Æ15 - Archelaus

Emitent Kings of Cappadokia
Rok 36 BC - 17 AD
Typ Standard circulation coin
Nominał
Waluta Drachm
Skład Bronze
Waga 2.1 g
Średnica 15 mm
Grubość 2.1 mm
Kształt Round (irregular)
Technika Hammered
Orientacja
Rytownik(zy)
W obiegu do
Źródło(a) Syd#19, SNG Copenhagen#168, BMC Greek#9
Opis awersu Turreted head of Artemis to right, dotted border.
Pismo awersu
Legenda awersu
Opis rewersu Palm branch dividing the lettering, monogram ΔH in right field.
Pismo rewersu Greek
Legenda rewersu EYΣE BEIAΣ
(Translation: Eusebeias)
Krawędź
Mennica
Nakład ND (36 BC - 17 AD) - -
ID Numisquare 6937279560
Dodatkowe informacje

Historical Context: This Æ15 bronze coin was issued by Archelaus, the last king of Cappadocia, whose extensive reign spanned from 36 BC to 17 AD. Appointed by Mark Antony and later confirmed by Octavian (Augustus), Archelaus was a pivotal client king navigating the tumultuous transition from the Roman Republic to the early Principate. His coinage reflects the delicate balance of maintaining local authority while acknowledging Roman suzerainty, a common characteristic of Hellenistic rulers under increasing Roman influence. His long rule saw Cappadocia remain a significant buffer state.

Artistry: The artistic execution of this Æ15 piece falls within the provincial Hellenistic tradition, albeit with an emerging Roman pragmatic influence. While specific engravers are unknown, the style typically features a portrait of Archelaus on the obverse, often rendered with a degree of realism characteristic of the period, though varying in quality. The reverse likely displays a local deity, an animal, or a dynastic symbol. The small flan size (15mm) often necessitated a somewhat simplified design, emphasizing key iconographic elements over intricate detail.

Technical/Grading: As a small bronze denomination, the Æ15 Archelaus often exhibits typical characteristics of provincial minting. High points on the obverse portrait, such as the hair, brow, and nose, are frequently susceptible to wear or weak strike. The reverse design may also show areas of flat strike, particularly on central motifs. Flan preparation could be inconsistent, leading to irregular shapes or slightly off-center strikes. Surface granularity and minor pitting are common for bronze issues of this era, impacting overall preservation and visual appeal.

×