Æ15 - Archelaus

Emisor Kings of Cappadokia
Año 36 BC - 17 AD
Tipo Standard circulation coin
Valor
Moneda Drachm
Composición Bronze
Peso 2.1 g
Diámetro 15 mm
Grosor 2.1 mm
Forma Round (irregular)
Técnica Hammered
Orientación
Grabador(es)
En circulación hasta
Referencia(s) Syd#19, SNG Copenhagen#168, BMC Greek#9
Descripción del anverso Turreted head of Artemis to right, dotted border.
Escritura del anverso
Leyenda del anverso
Descripción del reverso Palm branch dividing the lettering, monogram ΔH in right field.
Escritura del reverso Greek
Leyenda del reverso EYΣE BEIAΣ
(Translation: Eusebeias)
Canto
Casa de moneda
Tirada ND (36 BC - 17 AD) - -
ID de Numisquare 6937279560
Información adicional

Historical Context: This Æ15 bronze coin was issued by Archelaus, the last king of Cappadocia, whose extensive reign spanned from 36 BC to 17 AD. Appointed by Mark Antony and later confirmed by Octavian (Augustus), Archelaus was a pivotal client king navigating the tumultuous transition from the Roman Republic to the early Principate. His coinage reflects the delicate balance of maintaining local authority while acknowledging Roman suzerainty, a common characteristic of Hellenistic rulers under increasing Roman influence. His long rule saw Cappadocia remain a significant buffer state.

Artistry: The artistic execution of this Æ15 piece falls within the provincial Hellenistic tradition, albeit with an emerging Roman pragmatic influence. While specific engravers are unknown, the style typically features a portrait of Archelaus on the obverse, often rendered with a degree of realism characteristic of the period, though varying in quality. The reverse likely displays a local deity, an animal, or a dynastic symbol. The small flan size (15mm) often necessitated a somewhat simplified design, emphasizing key iconographic elements over intricate detail.

Technical/Grading: As a small bronze denomination, the Æ15 Archelaus often exhibits typical characteristics of provincial minting. High points on the obverse portrait, such as the hair, brow, and nose, are frequently susceptible to wear or weak strike. The reverse design may also show areas of flat strike, particularly on central motifs. Flan preparation could be inconsistent, leading to irregular shapes or slightly off-center strikes. Surface granularity and minor pitting are common for bronze issues of this era, impacting overall preservation and visual appeal.

×