See full images - free registration
Continue with Google - no registration! or register with email

Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!

1/4 Shekel

Issuer Carthage
Year 220 BC - 210 BC
Type Log in to see details
Value Log in to see details
Currency Log in to see details
Composition Log in to see details
Weight Log in to see details
Diameter Log in to see details
Thickness Log in to see details
Shape Log in to see details
Technique Log in to see details
Orientation Log in to see details
Engraver(s) Log in to see details
In circulation to Log in to see details
Reference(s) SNG Copenhagen#369
Obverse description Log in to see details
Obverse script Log in to see details
Obverse lettering Log in to see details
Reverse description A horse standing to the right in a composed, static pose, rendered in the compact style typical of Carthaginian fractional silver coinage. The animal is depicted with musculature carefully articulated, the head slightly turned, the tail falling naturally behind the haunches. A palm tree appears to the right of the horse, a symbol closely associated with Carthage and the Punic world. The ground line beneath the horse is faintly indicated. The field is otherwise plain and uninscribed.
Reverse script Log in to see details
Reverse lettering Log in to see details
Edge Plain
Mint Log in to see details
Mintage Log in to see details
Additional information

Struck during the Second Punic War, this fractional silver issue falls squarely within the period of Hannibal's Italian campaign — a conflict that stretched Carthaginian military financing to its limits and drove substantial coin production to pay mercenary forces operating far from North Africa. Small silver fractions like this one were essential for day-to-day troop payments, where full shekels were too valuable for minor transactions.

SNG Copenhagen 369 places this piece within a well-documented Carthaginian series, though attribution of specific mint sites remains contested between Carthage proper and Spanish or Sicilian field mints.

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE