Catalog
Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!
| Issuer | Uncertain city of Central Italy |
|---|---|
| Year | 301 BC - 201 BC |
| Type | Standard circulation coin |
| Value | Log in to see details |
| Currency | Log in to see details |
| Composition | Log in to see details |
| Weight | Log in to see details |
| Diameter | Log in to see details |
| Thickness | Log in to see details |
| Shape | Log in to see details |
| Technique | Log in to see details |
| Orientation | Log in to see details |
| Engraver(s) | Log in to see details |
| In circulation to | Log in to see details |
| Reference(s) | Log in to see details |
| Obverse description | Log in to see details |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | Log in to see details |
| Obverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Reverse description | A caduceus depicted in bold, schematic relief at center, consisting of a winged staff entwined by two serpents whose bodies form a pronounced wave pattern below. Above the staff wings, a small globular element is visible. The mark of value S (indicating semis, one-half) appears above the caduceus. The design is rendered in the simplified, high-relief style typical of central Italian aes grave issues of the third to second century BC, with the field otherwise plain. |
| Reverse script | Log in to see details |
| Reverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Edge | Log in to see details |
| Mint | Log in to see details |
| Mintage | ND (301 BC - 201 BC) |
| Additional information |
Heavy cast bronze of this size belongs to the earliest phase of Roman-influenced monetary production in central Italy, when Rome's own aes grave system was driving neighboring communities to adopt compatible weight standards. The caduceus as a type mark on fractional aes grave is a known but poorly understood convention — it appears across multiple issuing authorities and has frustrated attempts to assign these pieces to a single city with confidence, hence the persistent "uncertain" attribution that has survived generations of scholarship including Haeberlin's exhaustive 1910 corpus.
At over 135 grams for a half-unit, this piece adheres to the heavier end of the uncial reduction sequence before successive weight drops through the Second Punic War rendered such massive bronzes obsolete within decades.