Katalog
| İhraççı | Populonia |
|---|---|
| Yıl | 201 BC - 101 BC |
| Tür | Standard circulation coin |
| Değer | 11 Decimae = 11⁄10 Triens (1.1) |
| Para birimi | Uncial triens (circa 201-101 BC) |
| Bileşim | Bronze |
| Ağırlık | 15.69 g |
| Çap | 27 mm |
| Kalınlık | |
| Şekil | Round (irregular) |
| Teknik | Hammered |
| Yönlendirme | Variable alignment ↺ |
| Gravürcü(ler) | |
| Dolaşımda olduğu yıl | |
| Referans(lar) | Vecchi IV#45 Italy#190 , EC 1#139 Gr/It#3 1#96 |
| Ön yüz açıklaması | |
|---|---|
| Ön yüz yazısı | |
| Ön yüz lejandı | |
| Arka yüz açıklaması | |
| Arka yüz yazısı | Etruscan |
| Arka yüz lejandı | |
| Kenar | |
| Darphane | |
| Basma adedi | |
| Numisquare Kimliği | 4817904800 |
| Ek bilgiler |
Historical Context: This 11 Decimae bronze coin was issued by Populonia, a major Etruscan city-state, between 201 BC and 101 BC. This era saw Rome's firm hegemony over Italy, yet Populonia, famed for iron production, maintained local economic autonomy. The "11 Decimae" denomination indicates a fractional local value. The "Sethlans series" highlights veneration of Sethlans, the Etruscan god of fire and smithing (Roman Vulcan), a fitting choice for this metallurgical hub, reflecting its identity amidst Roman influence.
Artistry: Engravers for Etruscan coinage of this period are unknown; artistry blends indigenous Etruscan style with Hellenistic influences. The "Sethlans series" strongly implies the obverse features Sethlans, likely portrayed with characteristic attributes like a hammer or anvil, symbolizing his metallurgical domain. The reverse typically depicts an animal or symbol pertinent to Populonia or the deity. The overall aesthetic tends towards a robust, sometimes rustic, quality characteristic of contemporary Etruscan bronze issues, conveying significant iconographic detail.
Technical/Grading: As a substantial bronze coin (15.69 grams, 27 millimeters), strike quality is paramount. Key high-points for wear include Sethlans' facial features, hair, and intricate reverse details. Etruscan bronze coinage often presents technical challenges: off-center strikes, planchet imperfections, and uneven flan thickness. A well-struck example shows a full impression of the design, minimal surface corrosion, and good detail retention. High grades require strong strikes and well-preserved surfaces.