Catalogo
| Emittente | Kranaos |
|---|---|
| Anno | 300 BC - 280 BC |
| Tipo | Standard circulation coin |
| Valore | |
| Valuta | Drachm |
| Composizione | Bronze |
| Peso | 1.03 g |
| Diametro | 11.0 mm |
| Spessore | |
| Forma | Round (irregular) |
| Tecnica | Hammered |
| Orientamento | |
| Incisore/i | |
| In circolazione fino al | |
| Riferimento/i | Karia#219-220 Kayhan#1648-1649, Klein#535, HN Online#733 |
| Descrizione del dritto | Head of Helios facing slightly right |
|---|---|
| Scrittura del dritto | |
| Legenda del dritto | |
| Descrizione del rovescio | Grape bunch on vine with a crayfish to the left |
| Scrittura del rovescio | |
| Legenda del rovescio | KPAN |
| Bordo | |
| Zecca | |
| Tiratura |
ND (300 BC - 280 BC) - - |
| ID Numisquare | 7909082080 |
| Informazioni aggiuntive |
Historical Context: Kranaos, an enigmatic figure, issued this Æ11 during the turbulent early Hellenistic period (300-280 BC). Karia, a strategically vital region in southwestern Anatolia, was then a contested territory among the Successor Kingdoms. This modest bronze coinage likely served local economic needs and asserted Kranaos's authority within his domain, possibly as a local dynast or satrap under shifting hegemonies. His issues are critical evidence for understanding regional autonomy and economic networks during the fragmentation of Alexander's empire.
Artistry: The specific iconography of this Æ11 is not provided, but typical designs for small Carian bronzes of this era often feature a deity's head on the obverse, such as Zeus or Apollo, and a local symbol or animal on the reverse. The stylistic school would be broadly Hellenistic Greek, blending classical idealism and emerging naturalism, albeit executed in miniature. The engraver, likely a local craftsman, focused on clear, simplified depictions suitable for daily commerce, prioritizing legibility.
Technical/Grading: This Æ11, weighing 1.03 grams and measuring 11mm, is characteristic of small denominational bronzes. High-points, typically found on prominent features like hair, nose, or animal musculature, are often susceptible to wear. Technical strike qualities on such diminutive flans are frequently variable; off-center strikes, partial legends, or incomplete rendering of the design periphery are common due to rapid striking and die limitations. Flan preparation also varies, with some examples exhibiting irregular shapes or rough edges, impacting overall visual appeal.