Catalogue
| Émetteur | Massalia |
|---|---|
| Année | 49 BC - 25 BC |
| Type | Standard circulation coin |
| Valeur | |
| Devise | |
| Composition | Bronze |
| Poids | 1.46 g |
| Diamètre | 11 mm |
| Épaisseur | |
| Forme | Round (irregular) |
| Technique | Hammered |
| Orientation | Variable alignment ↺ |
| Graveur(s) | |
| En circulation jusqu’à | |
| Référence(s) | LT#2110 |
| Description de l’avers | Helmeted head of Minerva right. |
|---|---|
| Écriture de l’avers | |
| Légende de l’avers | |
| Description du revers | Lion right. |
| Écriture du revers | Greek |
| Légende du revers |
MAΣΣ (Translation: Massalia) |
| Tranche | |
| Atelier | |
| Tirage |
ND (49 BC - 25 BC) - - |
| ID Numisquare | 6550897170 |
| Informations supplémentaires |
Historical Context: The Æ11, issued by Massalia between 49 BC and 25 BC, reflects a pivotal era for this ancient Greek colony. After its subjugation by Julius Caesar in 49 BC, Massalia transitioned from an independent maritime power to a Roman federated city. Despite losing its fleet and outer territories, the city retained commercial vitality and limited autonomy, including the right to mint local bronze coinage. This issue signifies Massalia's continued economic activity and its integration into the Roman provincial system during the late Republic and early Augustan Principate.
Artistry: Artistically, this Æ11 follows the late Hellenistic tradition, subtly incorporating Roman provincial influences common during this transitional period. While no specific engraver is identifiable, the stylistic school drew upon Massalia's rich Greek heritage. Common designs for such bronzes often feature a laureate head of a deity, typically Apollo or Artemis, on the obverse, and a local symbol like a lion or bull on the reverse. The small 11mm module necessitated simplified, yet recognizable, iconography for utilitarian civic issues.
Technical/Grading: This Æ11, weighing 1.46 grams, is typical of small-denomination bronze issues from ancient Massalia. High-points for detail usually include the deity's facial features and hair, or any animal motif's musculature. Strike quality often varies; small flans frequently result in off-center strikes or incomplete impressions. Die wear, planchet irregularities, and surface corrosion are common technical considerations for grading these ancient bronzes, impacting the preservation of finer details and overall aesthetic appeal.