Volledige afbeeldingen bekijken — gratis registratie
Doorgaan met Google — het is gratis of registreer met e-mail

Waarom registreren? Alleen om bots buiten ons catalogus te houden. Uw e-mail blijft privé — we delen het nooit en sturen u niets zonder uw toestemming. Dat garanderen wij u!

11/2 Réis - Hybrid Afonso VI/João IV ?? Pattern ??

Uitgever Portugal
Jaar 1656-1667
Type Log in om details te zien
Waarde Log in om details te zien
Valuta Log in om details te zien
Samenstelling Log in om details te zien
Gewicht Log in om details te zien
Diameter Log in om details te zien
Dikte Log in om details te zien
Vorm Log in om details te zien
Techniek Log in om details te zien
Oriëntatie Log in om details te zien
Graveur(s) Log in om details te zien
In omloop tot Log in om details te zien
Referentie(s) Gomes#A6 01.01
Beschrijving voorzijde Obverse die taken from a Tostão of Afonso VI (Gomes A6 22 type). Central field features the crowned Portuguese royal arms — the quartered shield bearing the five quinas (inescutcheons) of Portugal and the castle bordure of Castile — surmounted by a royal crown. The armorial design is set within a beaded or rope inner circle. The peripheral legend, partially legible on this hammered and worn specimen, reads ALPHONSVS VI DG REX POR in Latin capitals, identifying the issuer as King Afonso VI of Portugal.
Schrift voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Opschrift voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Beschrijving keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Schrift keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Opschrift keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Rand Plain
Muntplaats Log in om details te zien
Oplage Log in om details te zien
Aanvullende informatie

The "hybrid" designation here reflects a genuinely strange transitional moment: Afonso VI nominally assumed the Portuguese throne in 1656 at age thirteen, but effective power remained contested, first under his mother Luísa de Gusmão as regent and later under the Count of Castelo Melhor. Coins pairing Afonso's reign attribution with João IV's dies were not an oversight — they were the product of a mint still working through inherited dies while royal authority itself was unresolved. The question marks in the pattern attribution remain unresolved in the literature, and Gomes catalogues this as a unique or near-unique type.

MISSCHIEN OOK INTERESSANT