See full images - free registration
Continue with Google - no registration! or register with email

Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!

11/2 Réis - Hybrid Afonso VI/João IV ?? Pattern ??

Issuer Portugal
Year 1656-1667
Type Log in to see details
Value Log in to see details
Currency Log in to see details
Composition Log in to see details
Weight Log in to see details
Diameter Log in to see details
Thickness Log in to see details
Shape Log in to see details
Technique Log in to see details
Orientation Log in to see details
Engraver(s) Log in to see details
In circulation to Log in to see details
Reference(s) Gomes#A6 01.01
Obverse description Obverse die taken from a Tostão of Afonso VI (Gomes A6 22 type). Central field features the crowned Portuguese royal arms — the quartered shield bearing the five quinas (inescutcheons) of Portugal and the castle bordure of Castile — surmounted by a royal crown. The armorial design is set within a beaded or rope inner circle. The peripheral legend, partially legible on this hammered and worn specimen, reads ALPHONSVS VI DG REX POR in Latin capitals, identifying the issuer as King Afonso VI of Portugal.
Obverse script Log in to see details
Obverse lettering Log in to see details
Reverse description Log in to see details
Reverse script Log in to see details
Reverse lettering Log in to see details
Edge Plain
Mint Log in to see details
Mintage Log in to see details
Additional information

The "hybrid" designation here reflects a genuinely strange transitional moment: Afonso VI nominally assumed the Portuguese throne in 1656 at age thirteen, but effective power remained contested, first under his mother Luísa de Gusmão as regent and later under the Count of Castelo Melhor. Coins pairing Afonso's reign attribution with João IV's dies were not an oversight — they were the product of a mint still working through inherited dies while royal authority itself was unresolved. The question marks in the pattern attribution remain unresolved in the literature, and Gomes catalogues this as a unique or near-unique type.

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE