目录
查看完整图片 — 免费注册
使用Google继续 — 免费
或用邮箱注册
为什么需要注册？只是为了防止机器人访问我们的目录。您的邮箱完全保密——我们绝不会分享或在未经您许可的情况下发送任何内容。我们向您保证！
| 正面描述 | 登录 以查看详情 |
|---|---|
| 正面文字 | 登录 以查看详情 |
| 正面铭文 | 登录 以查看详情 |
| 背面描述 | A palm branch oriented vertically dominates the central field, its fronds spreading symmetrically to either side in a stylised, almost floral arrangement. A taenia (fillet or ribbon) is depicted tied around or associated with the palm, a conventional symbol of victory and honour in Hellenistic numismatic iconography. A star or comet appears in the field alongside the palm, echoing the celestial motif of the obverse and reinforcing the probable dynastic or civic symbolism of the issue. The reverse is uninscribed, with no legend, exergue line, or mint mark visible. The style is consistent with the small anonymous bronze issues attributed to uncertain cities of the Pontic region, circa 130–100 BC. |
| 背面文字 | 登录 以查看详情 |
| 背面铭文 | 登录 以查看详情 |
| 边缘 | Plain |
| 铸币厂 | 登录 以查看详情 |
| 铸造量 | 登录 以查看详情 |
| 附加信息 |
The attribution to an uncertain Pontic mint reflects genuine scholarly disagreement rather than incomplete cataloging. The Black Sea coastal cities of this period — Amisos, Sinope, Trapezus among them — operated with considerable monetary independence under Mithridates V before his son consolidated regional control in the 110s BC. Small bronzes of this size circulated as fractional currency across a trading zone where Greek, indigenous Anatolian, and increasingly Roman commercial interests overlapped.
HGC 7, 317 groups several closely related types under this uncertain attribution pending die-link studies that might anchor production to a specific city.