Volledige afbeeldingen bekijken — gratis registratie
Doorgaan met Google — het is gratis of registreer met e-mail

Waarom registreren? Alleen om bots buiten ons catalogus te houden. Uw e-mail blijft privé — we delen het nooit en sturen u niets zonder uw toestemming. Dat garanderen wij u!

1000 Pesos Law of Jan 2nd., 1939 - Issued by BCU

Uitgever Banco de la República Oriental del Uruguay
Jaar 1967
Type Standard circulation banknote
Waarde Log in om details te zien
Valuta Log in om details te zien
Samenstelling Log in om details te zien
Afmetingen Log in om details te zien
Vorm Log in om details te zien
Drukker Log in om details te zien
Ontwerper(s) Log in om details te zien
Graveur(s) Log in om details te zien
In omloop tot Log in om details te zien
Referentie(s) Log in om details te zien
Beschrijving voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Opschrift voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Beschrijving keerzijde A large central vignette reproduces the oil painting "Artigas en la meseta" (Artigas at the Tableland) by Carlos María Herrera, rendered in intaglio with fine detail. The issuer's name is inscribed across the top, while the face value appears in both numeral and word form on the lateral panels. Guilloche borders frame the entire composition.
Opschrift keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Handtekening(en) Log in om details te zien
Beveiligingstype Watermark
Beschrijving beveiliging Log in om details te zien
Varianten Log in om details te zien
Opmerkingen

By 1967, Uruguay was in the grip of a prolonged economic deterioration that would eventually force a complete currency reform — the 1000 Pesos denomination, once substantial, had been rendered nearly meaningless by inflation before the series was even retired. The legal authority cited on the note, the Law of January 2nd, 1939, predates the note's actual issue date by nearly three decades, a gap that reflects how Uruguayan monetary legislation was drafted with broad, open-ended mandates rather than issue-specific authorization.

Thomas De La Rue printed this series in London throughout multiple decades of continuous use, with relatively minor plate modifications between early and late printings — making precise date attribution on undated specimens genuinely difficult without serial prefix analysis.

MISSCHIEN OOK INTERESSANT