Volledige afbeeldingen bekijken — gratis registratie
Doorgaan met Google — het is gratis of registreer met e-mail

Waarom registreren? Alleen om bots buiten ons catalogus te houden. Uw e-mail blijft privé — we delen het nooit en sturen u niets zonder uw toestemming. Dat garanderen wij u!

100 francs - Bon de Solidarité

Uitgever Secours National / Croix-Rouge Française
Jaar 1940-1944
Type Log in om details te zien
Waarde Log in om details te zien
Valuta Log in om details te zien
Samenstelling Log in om details te zien
Afmetingen Log in om details te zien
Vorm Log in om details te zien
Drukker Log in om details te zien
Ontwerper(s) Log in om details te zien
Graveur(s) Log in om details te zien
In omloop tot Yes
Referentie(s) Log in om details te zien
Beschrijving voorzijde Central vignette shows two swallows in flight carrying a parcel toward a barred window, symbolising aid to prisoners of war. An oval portrait of Maréchal Pétain is inset at left. The bicolour border underprint repeats Vichy francisque axes and stars in blue and red.
Opschrift voorzijde BON DE SOLIDARITÉ
CENT
FRANCS
AU PROFIT DES POPULATIONS CIVILES ÉPROUVÉES PAR LA GUERRE ET DES PRISONNIERS
Beschrijving keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Opschrift keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Handtekening(en) Log in om details te zien
Beveiligingstype Log in om details te zien
Beschrijving beveiliging Log in om details te zien
Varianten Log in om details te zien
Opmerkingen

The Bons de Solidarité were not banknotes in any monetary sense — they were essentially a compulsory charitable fiction. The Vichy government backed the Secours National as its primary welfare vehicle, and from 1940 onward these bonds were sold at face value to French citizens, with social and sometimes professional pressure making refusal difficult. The Croix-Rouge Française co-issued the series, lending it a veneer of humanitarian neutrality that obscured the degree to which the Secours National operated as a Vichy propaganda instrument.

They were never legal tender and could not be spent. The holder exchanged them for nothing — the point was the transfer of funds upward, not any redemption. Surviving examples are relatively common precisely because there was no mechanism to return them.

MISSCHIEN OOK INTERESSANT