Catalog
Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!
| Issuer | Grohmann & Frosch, Leipzig-Plagwitz |
|---|---|
| Year | |
| Type | Log in to see details |
| Value | 10 Pfennigs (10 Pfennige) (0.10) |
| Currency | Log in to see details |
| Composition | Log in to see details |
| Weight | Log in to see details |
| Diameter | Log in to see details |
| Thickness | Log in to see details |
| Shape | Log in to see details |
| Technique | Log in to see details |
| Orientation | Log in to see details |
| Engraver(s) | Log in to see details |
| In circulation to | Log in to see details |
| Reference(s) | Log in to see details |
| Obverse description | Log in to see details |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | Log in to see details |
| Obverse lettering | GROHMANN & FROSCH 10 ★ LEIPZIG-PLAGWITZ ★ |
| Reverse description | Octagonal reverse sharing the same pearl border treatment as the obverse. A rope or twisted inner circle encloses the large denomination numeral '10' at center, with a small triangular cut-out piercing at the top. The surrounding legend 'KLEINGELDERSATZMARKE' (small change substitute token) arcs around the upper and lateral portions of the inner ring, while three five-pointed stars are distributed along the lower field between the beaded border and the inner circle. |
| Reverse script | Log in to see details |
| Reverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Edge | Log in to see details |
| Mint | Log in to see details |
| Mintage | Log in to see details |
| Additional information |
Grohmann & Frosch was a Leipzig-Plagwitz textile and manufacturing concern that issued notgeld during the acute small-change shortages of the First World War, when the German public began hoarding copper and nickel coins almost immediately after mobilization in 1914. Private industrial firms across Saxony filled the void with zinc and iron pieces redeemable only at their own premises — a practice the Reich tolerated out of necessity rather than policy.