Katalog
| Emitent | Pergamon |
|---|---|
| Rok | 310 BC - 284 BC |
| Typ | Standard circulation coin |
| Nominał | |
| Waluta | Drachm |
| Skład | Bronze |
| Waga | 0.1 g |
| Średnica | 10 mm |
| Grubość | |
| Kształt | Round (irregular) |
| Technika | Hammered |
| Orientacja | Medal alignment ↑↑ |
| Rytownik(zy) | |
| W obiegu do | |
| Źródło(a) | SNG Copenhagen#325 |
| Opis awersu | Helmeted head of Athena facing right. |
|---|---|
| Pismo awersu | |
| Legenda awersu | |
| Opis rewersu | Two stars with Q above. |
| Pismo rewersu | |
| Legenda rewersu | |
| Krawędź | |
| Mennica | |
| Nakład |
ND (310 BC - 284 BC) - - |
| ID Numisquare | 9460486220 |
| Dodatkowe informacje |
Historical Context: This Æ10 coin from Pergamon dates to the critical period of 310-284 BC, a time of intense flux during the Wars of the Diadochi following Alexander the Great's death. Pergamon, then a strategically vital fortress city, was under the control of Lysimachus, King of Thrace and Asia Minor. While not yet an independent kingdom under the Attalids, this coinage reflects Pergamon's burgeoning importance as a regional center within Lysimachus's vast domain. Its issuance signifies local economic activity and the need for small denomination currency, laying groundwork for its future prominence.
Artistry: Given its diminutive size and early Hellenistic origin, a specific engraver is unidentifiable. The artistry adheres to the broader Hellenistic stylistic school, likely influenced by Attic traditions. Typically, such small bronzes from Pergamon feature a helmeted head of Athena on the obverse, rendered with a degree of local interpretation, and a symbolic reverse, often an owl or a star. The design, though simplified by the small flan, would have aimed for immediate recognition and clear association with the issuing authority and city.
Technical/Grading: Weighing a mere 0.1 grams and measuring 10 millimeters, this Æ10 presents significant technical challenges. High-points for strike quality would include Athena's helmet crest and facial features, or the detailed feathers of an owl. Due to the small flan and bronze medium, full strikes are rare; off-centering, weak details, and minor flan imperfections are common. A well-centered example with discernible design elements, despite the inherent limitations, would be highly prized, as surface wear and patination often obscure finer details.