Volledige afbeeldingen bekijken — gratis registratie
Doorgaan met Google — het is gratis of registreer met e-mail

Waarom registreren? Alleen om bots buiten ons catalogus te houden. Uw e-mail blijft privé — we delen het nooit en sturen u niets zonder uw toestemming. Dat garanderen wij u!

1 Văn - Gia Hưng

Uitgever Đàng Trong
Jaar 1796
Type Log in om details te zien
Waarde Log in om details te zien
Valuta Log in om details te zien
Samenstelling Log in om details te zien
Gewicht Log in om details te zien
Diameter Log in om details te zien
Dikte Log in om details te zien
Vorm Round with a square hole
Techniek Log in om details te zien
Oriëntatie Log in om details te zien
Graveur(s) Log in om details te zien
In omloop tot Log in om details te zien
Referentie(s) Log in om details te zien
Beschrijving voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Schrift voorzijde Chinese (traditional, regular script)
Opschrift voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Beschrijving keerzijde Plain reverse featuring a raised inner rim surrounding the central square perforation and a raised outer rim along the coin's edge, with an otherwise completely blank and unadorned field. The casting surface displays a pale, weathered zinc patina typical of late eighteenth-century Vietnamese cash coinage.
Schrift keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Opschrift keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Rand Log in om details te zien
Muntplaats Log in om details te zien
Oplage Log in om details te zien
Aanvullende informatie

Đàng Trong — the southern Vietnamese polity nominally under Nguyễn lords — was in its death throes by 1796. The Tây Sơn rebellion had effectively destroyed Nguyễn power in the south years earlier, and this issue dates to a period when legitimate authority over the region was genuinely contested. Zinc cash coins of this type circulated alongside Chinese and older Vietnamese issues in a monetary environment with no reliable enforcement of any single standard.

Barker 86.1 is among the later zinc issues attributed to the Gia Hưng reign title, a period so administratively fragmented that attribution itself remains debated among specialists.

MISSCHIEN OOK INTERESSANT