Catalogus
Waarom registreren? Alleen om bots buiten ons catalogus te houden. Uw e-mail blijft privé — we delen het nooit en sturen u niets zonder uw toestemming. Dat garanderen wij u!
| Uitgever | Đàng Trong |
|---|---|
| Jaar | 1796 |
| Type | Log in om details te zien |
| Waarde | Log in om details te zien |
| Valuta | Log in om details te zien |
| Samenstelling | Log in om details te zien |
| Gewicht | Log in om details te zien |
| Diameter | Log in om details te zien |
| Dikte | Log in om details te zien |
| Vorm | Round with a square hole |
| Techniek | Log in om details te zien |
| Oriëntatie | Log in om details te zien |
| Graveur(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| In omloop tot | Log in om details te zien |
| Referentie(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| Beschrijving voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
|---|---|
| Schrift voorzijde | Chinese (traditional, regular script) |
| Opschrift voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Beschrijving keerzijde | Plain reverse featuring a raised inner rim surrounding the central square perforation and a raised outer rim along the coin's edge, with an otherwise completely blank and unadorned field. The casting surface displays a pale, weathered zinc patina typical of late eighteenth-century Vietnamese cash coinage. |
| Schrift keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Opschrift keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Rand | Log in om details te zien |
| Muntplaats | Log in om details te zien |
| Oplage | Log in om details te zien |
| Aanvullende informatie |
Đàng Trong — the southern Vietnamese polity nominally under Nguyễn lords — was in its death throes by 1796. The Tây Sơn rebellion had effectively destroyed Nguyễn power in the south years earlier, and this issue dates to a period when legitimate authority over the region was genuinely contested. Zinc cash coins of this type circulated alongside Chinese and older Vietnamese issues in a monetary environment with no reliable enforcement of any single standard.
Barker 86.1 is among the later zinc issues attributed to the Gia Hưng reign title, a period so administratively fragmented that attribution itself remains debated among specialists.