Catalog
See full images - free registration
Continue with Google - no registration!
or register with email
Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!
1 Uncia Wheel / Amphora
| Issuer | Uncertain Etruscan mint |
|---|---|
| Year | 240 BC - 225 BC |
| Type | Standard circulation coin |
| Value | Log in to see details |
| Currency | Log in to see details |
| Composition | Log in to see details |
| Weight | Log in to see details |
| Diameter | Log in to see details |
| Thickness | Log in to see details |
| Shape | Log in to see details |
| Technique | Log in to see details |
| Orientation | Log in to see details |
| Engraver(s) | Log in to see details |
| In circulation to | Log in to see details |
| Reference(s) | Log in to see details |
| Obverse description | A four-spoked wheel depicted in low relief, centrally positioned within a plain, flat field. The four spokes radiate symmetrically from a central hub, with the rim forming a complete circle around the design. The casting is characteristic of Etruscan aes grave production, with a somewhat irregular flan and rough surface texture typical of the period. |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | Log in to see details |
| Obverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Reverse description | Log in to see details |
| Reverse script | Log in to see details |
| Reverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Edge | Log in to see details |
| Mint | Log in to see details |
| Mintage | ND (240 BC - 225 BC) |
| Additional information |
Etruscan bronze coinage of this period remains poorly understood in terms of specific issuing authority — no mint has been definitively assigned, and attribution continues to shift across scholarship. What is clear is that these small cast bronzes circulated in a region under mounting Roman pressure during the First Punic War years, when Roman monetary infrastructure was itself still coalescing around the aes grave system. The uncia fraction, representing one-twelfth of the as, was the smallest practical denomination in that weight standard.
Haeberlin's foundational typology, compiled from hoard and collection data in the early twentieth century, remains the primary reference framework despite its age.