Volledige afbeeldingen bekijken — gratis registratie
Doorgaan met Google — het is gratis of registreer met e-mail

Waarom registreren? Alleen om bots buiten ons catalogus te houden. Uw e-mail blijft privé — we delen het nooit en sturen u niets zonder uw toestemming. Dat garanderen wij u!

1 Uncia Augur / Sacrificial implements

Uitgever Uncertain Etruscan mint
Jaar 240 BC - 225 BC
Type Log in om details te zien
Waarde Log in om details te zien
Valuta Log in om details te zien
Samenstelling Log in om details te zien
Gewicht Log in om details te zien
Diameter Log in om details te zien
Dikte Log in om details te zien
Vorm Log in om details te zien
Techniek Log in om details te zien
Oriëntatie Log in om details te zien
Graveur(s) Log in om details te zien
In omloop tot Log in om details te zien
Referentie(s) ICC#195, HN Italy#68e, Catalli#82e, Haeberlin#p.275, SNG Firenze 2#1108
Beschrijving voorzijde Facing head of an augur rendered in low relief, depicted frontally with broadly modelled facial features characteristic of Etruscan aes grave coinage. The head displays schematic hair rendered as radiating strands framing the face. No legend or inscription appears in the field. The casting shows the bold, somewhat archaic artistic style typical of central Italian bronze coinage of the mid-third century BC.
Schrift voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Opschrift voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Beschrijving keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Schrift keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Opschrift keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Rand Plain
Muntplaats Log in om details te zien
Oplage Log in om details te zien
Aanvullende informatie

The fractional bronze issues attributed to uncertain Etruscan mints in the mid-third century BC were produced at a moment when Rome's monetary influence was pressing hard into northern Italy, pushing local communities to formalize coinage systems they had previously managed without. This piece belongs to a group that scholars have long struggled to assign with confidence — the "uncertain Etruscan" attribution itself reflects genuine disagreement, with Populonia, Vetulonia, and several smaller centers all proposed at various points.

Haeberlin's foundational work on aes grave remains the starting point for any serious study of this series, though his attributions have been revised repeatedly since publication in 1910.

MISSCHIEN OOK INTERESSANT