Catalogus
| Uitgever | Uncertain city of Central Italy |
|---|---|
| Jaar | 301 BC - 201 BC |
| Type | Log in om details te zien |
| Waarde | Uncia (1⁄12) |
| Valuta | Log in om details te zien |
| Samenstelling | Log in om details te zien |
| Gewicht | Log in om details te zien |
| Diameter | Log in om details te zien |
| Dikte | Log in om details te zien |
| Vorm | Log in om details te zien |
| Techniek | Log in om details te zien |
| Oriëntatie | Log in om details te zien |
| Graveur(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| In omloop tot | Log in om details te zien |
| Referentie(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| Beschrijving voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
|---|---|
| Schrift voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Opschrift voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Beschrijving keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Schrift keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Opschrift keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Rand | Plain |
| Muntplaats | Log in om details te zien |
| Oplage | ND (301 BC - 201 BC) - Unique |
| Aanvullende informatie |
The attribution "uncertain city of Central Italy" reflects a genuine scholarly impasse — these cast bronze pieces circulate through the literature under shifting assignments, with Haeberlin, Sydenham, and later researchers disagreeing on whether production belonged to a Latin, Oscan, or Umbrian community. The aes grave tradition they belong to was already obsolescent by the mid-third century, accelerated by Rome's expanding monetary dominance following the Pyrrhic War and the Second Punic War's financial disruptions.
Cast rather than struck, placing it firmly in pre-reform bronze production before the reducted libral standard took hold.