Catalogus
Waarom registreren? Alleen om bots buiten ons catalogus te houden. Uw e-mail blijft privé — we delen het nooit en sturen u niets zonder uw toestemming. Dat garanderen wij u!
| Uitgever | Uncertain Germanic tribes |
|---|---|
| Jaar | 475-500 |
| Type | Standard circulation coin |
| Waarde | Log in om details te zien |
| Valuta | Log in om details te zien |
| Samenstelling | Log in om details te zien |
| Gewicht | Log in om details te zien |
| Diameter | Log in om details te zien |
| Dikte | Log in om details te zien |
| Vorm | Log in om details te zien |
| Techniek | Log in om details te zien |
| Oriëntatie | Log in om details te zien |
| Graveur(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| In omloop tot | Log in om details te zien |
| Referentie(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| Beschrijving voorzijde | Right-facing bust of Emperor Leo I, pearl-diademed, draped, and cuirassed, rendered in the late antique imperial tradition. The effigy is encircled by a beaded border and accompanied by a continuous Latin legend in the field. The workmanship reflects a barbarian imitative style, with somewhat schematic facial features and simplified drapery typical of Germanic workshop production of the late fifth century. |
|---|---|
| Schrift voorzijde | Latin |
| Opschrift voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Beschrijving keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Schrift keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Opschrift keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Rand | Log in om details te zien |
| Muntplaats | Log in om details te zien |
| Oplage | Log in om details te zien |
| Aanvullende informatie |
After the deposition of Romulus Augustulus in 476, various Germanic successor powers continued striking tremisses in the names of legitimate Eastern emperors — a deliberate act of fiscal conservatism, since coins bearing recognized imperial names circulated without friction across former Roman territories. Invoking Leo I, who had died in 474, placed these issues in a narrow window of retrospective legitimacy.
Attribution remains contested. The Arles reference points toward a southern Gallic mint, possibly under Visigothic control during their peak territorial expansion into Provence.